2002
DOI: 10.1086/344198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SN 1993J VLBI. II. Related Changes of the Deceleration, Flux Density Decay, and Spectrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

21
135
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
21
135
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each group has used different data acquisition and analysis strategies. Bartel et al (2002) confirmed the deceleration reported earlier by Marcaide et al (1997), but claimed that the values of m differ for different expansion periods. Those results were in agreement with previous results from numerical simulations made by Mioduszewski et al (2001) using a rather specific explosion model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each group has used different data acquisition and analysis strategies. Bartel et al (2002) confirmed the deceleration reported earlier by Marcaide et al (1997), but claimed that the values of m differ for different expansion periods. Those results were in agreement with previous results from numerical simulations made by Mioduszewski et al (2001) using a rather specific explosion model.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The results from such monitoring have lent support to the SCIM initially proposed by Chevalier (1982a,b). However, Bartel et al (2002) claim to have detected departures from a self-similar expansion with regimes of changing expansion rates over different periods. In this paper, we provide evidence contrary to such claims based on our own data and on the use of new analysis tools, and support the validity of the SCIM model in which additional fine observational effects have to be taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the brightest RSN ever, SN1986J, has developed a complex and evolving morphology, and a spectrum which flattens over time (Bietenholz et al 2010a), however the lower limit on the expansion speed for the source in NGC 660 is significantly greater than the expansion seen in 1986J, or other nearby ordinary RSN which have been wellstudied on VLBI scales (e.g. Bartel et al 2002;Fenech et al 2010;Martí-Vidal et al 2011).…”
Section: A Single Luminous Radio Supernova/remnantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model uncertainty will usually dominate the uncertainty in the size estimate. Nonetheless, in most cases, angular size estimates can be made with a fractional accuracy of better than 50%, leading to estimates of the apparent expansion velocity of similar accuracy provided the distance and explosion date are well constrained (see Bartel et al 2002;Bietenholz, Soderberg, & Bartel 2009, for more detailed discussions of this process). Bietenholz & Bartel (2005 a The peak spectral luminosity of the supernova at 8.4 GHz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%