2005
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snail, Slug, and Smad‐interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND It was demonstrated previously that the Snail family of transcription factors and Smad‐interacting protein 1 (Sip1) regulate E‐cadherin and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP‐2) expression, cellular morphology, and invasion in carcinoma. For the current study, the authors analyzed the relation between the expression of Snail, Slug, and Sip1; the expression of MMP‐2 and E‐cadherin; and clinical parameters in patients with metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. METHODS One hundred one fresh‐frozen, mal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

25
315
1
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
25
315
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are also in line with the recent observation that SNAI1 expression is a requisite for lymph node metastasis of human breast carcinoma cells (Olmeda et al, 2007b). On the other hand, the strong influence of Snai2 silencing in reduction of liver and lung metastasis could be related to the cell survival properties (Inoue et al, 2002;Perez-Losada et al, 2003;Kajita et al, 2004) or the specific migration properties conferred by Snai2 (Barrallo-Gimeno and Nieto, 2005;Elloul et al, 2005;Come et al, 2006) that could restrain effective lung and liver colonization in its absence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are also in line with the recent observation that SNAI1 expression is a requisite for lymph node metastasis of human breast carcinoma cells (Olmeda et al, 2007b). On the other hand, the strong influence of Snai2 silencing in reduction of liver and lung metastasis could be related to the cell survival properties (Inoue et al, 2002;Perez-Losada et al, 2003;Kajita et al, 2004) or the specific migration properties conferred by Snai2 (Barrallo-Gimeno and Nieto, 2005;Elloul et al, 2005;Come et al, 2006) that could restrain effective lung and liver colonization in its absence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Nevertheless, a significant decrease of MMP9 and mesenchymal markers was detected in CarB-shSnai2 xenografts (Figure 5), suggesting that Snai2 can control certain aspects of tumor invasion/differentiation in determined tumor contexts. These observations are also compatible with the differential roles proposed for Snai1 and Snai2 factors in individual vs collective tumor invasion, or distinct anatomic dissemination of breast and ovarian tumors (Elloul et al, 2005(Elloul et al, , 2006Come et al, 2006), and for Snai2 in wound healing migration (Savagner et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The analysis of the Snai2-expressing mice identified that 'uncontrolled' Snai2 expression induces cancer in mice. These findings further indicated that overexpression of SNAI2 by human tumours could be of importance to both cell fate selection by genotoxic anticancer agents (Perez-Mancera et al, 2005) and clinical management of human cancer patients (Elloul et al, 2005;Shih et al, 2005;Bermejo-Rodriguez et al, 2006;Come et al, 2006). These results suggested that Snai2 expression was protecting cells from death by genetic alterations as a consequence of an inherent, basal level of genetic instability (Sanchez-Garcia, 1997;Pérez-Caro et al, 2005;Perez-Mancera et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The implication of SNAI2 in human cancer seems to be wider than initially expected (Elloul et al, 2005;Gupta et al, 2005;Shih et al, 2005;Bermejo-Rodriguez et al, 2006;Come et al, 2006). Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms by which SNAI2 participates in these biological processes are not yet clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A number of transcription factors that are important regulators of EMT in development act as repressors of E-cadherin expression. Elevated expression of several of these factors including Snail, Slug, SIP1 and Twist have been identified in EOC and associated with less favorable patient outcomes [72][73][74][75][76]. Ectopic expression of Snail, Slug or Twist in ovarian cancer cell lines results in repression of E-cadherin with accompanying EMT, enhanced motility, and invasiveness suggesting that transcriptional regulation of E-cadherin may be operational in EOC [72,75].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%