2002
DOI: 10.1037/0002-9432.72.1.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snake oil, ethics, and the first amendment: What's a profession to do?

Abstract: This article considers the appropriate legal and ethical response to those whose advocacy of “alternative” or unvalidated therapies places people at risk of harm. What are our professional responsibilities with respect to such advocacy, and what sorts of harm will justify government intervention?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kennedy et al 180 stated that unvalidated treatments often claim to be effective against a range of disorders with different symptoms and etiologies. Worrall 181 recommended that the public be suspicious of any therapy that claims to treat a large number of illnesses.…”
Section: Scientific Research and Dissemination To The Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy et al 180 stated that unvalidated treatments often claim to be effective against a range of disorders with different symptoms and etiologies. Worrall 181 recommended that the public be suspicious of any therapy that claims to treat a large number of illnesses.…”
Section: Scientific Research and Dissemination To The Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As this was not accounted for by low statistical power, this strongly suggests that interventions must be evaluated before dissemination and implementation, in order to avoid implementing theoretically coherent but empirically ineffective interventions. This problem is given more attention, as the number of trials that report adverse events and unanticipated problems has increased (e.g., Boettcher, Rozental, Andersson, & Carlbring, 2014; Horigian, Robbins, Dominguez, Ucha, & Carmen, 2010; Jonsson, Alaie, Parling, & Arnberg, 2014; Kennedy, Mercer, Mohr, & Huffine, 2002; Lilienfeld, 2007; Lipsey & Cullen, 2007). The methodological quality index score was not statistically related to effect size.…”
Section: Discussion and Applications To Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I USA kvävdes den tioåriga flickan Candace Newmaker till döds av sina föräldrar år 2000. Det skedde i samband med att föräldrarna tillämpade Rebirthing och under överinseende av professionella terapeuter (Kennedy, Mercer, Mohr & Huffine 2002).…”
Section: Kan Terapeutisk Allians Förhindra Skadliga Insatser?unclassified