Snakes and ladders: legal coercion, housing precarity, and home‐making aspirations in southern England

Abstract

The potential for eviction is an ordinary condition of domestic life for many in Europe and North America. This poses a challenge to anthropological theories of the state's presence in ordinary homes, which have accounted for public housing and mass displacement, but not liberalized settings where the state has ostensibly withdrawn from the home. Studies of housing precarity identify state policy and capitalist transformation among its sources, but the consequences of housing precarity for domesticity itself have not been fully explored. Private renters on a housing estate in southern England responded to the bleak prospect of eviction with home-making pursuits that would instil a sense of optimism in their homes, including mortgage-based ownership and immersive home entertainment technology. By examining the interplay between fears of eviction and home-making aspirations, this article argues that the British state's organization of legitimate coercion has a subtle but significant influence on tenants' ethical visions of what constitutes a good home.

Homeownership, Depression, and Life Satisfaction in China: The Gender and Urban-Rural Disparities

“…Asset theory acknowledges that wealth, one of the important SES indicators, has a substantial impact on psychological outcomes regardless of household income. In particular, owner-occupied housing is an important component of household assets that convey crucial psychological meanings to the residents [ 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 ]. The positive effects of homeownership on psychological well-being have been well documented.…”

The Simple Bare Necessities: Scales and Paradoxes of Thrift on a London Public Housing Estate

“…Pre-prepared, expensive food is more wasteful in terms of cost and packaging but speaks to a different moralized schema of class ascent. Home ownership promised stability, a key characteristic of the condition of thrift, and dignity in a re-moralized Britain (Davey 2019b), but was also founded on speculation that was undermined by government policies that left many homebuyers vulnerable to eviction, even before Compulsory Purchase Orders decimated their investment. Meanwhile, many continued to rely on kin-based networks as their main resource for managing, meeting both utilitarian and moral needs.…”

Everyday Authoritarianism: Class and Coercion on Housing Estates in Neoliberal Britain

“…We conceptualize the term expansively and simply as people who do not own enough private property to live off; thus, it encompasses those occupied outside of formal employment and those employed outside blue-collar jobs. For the more precarious sector of the working class on whom we focus, their exposure to legal coercion aids their subjection to class-related stigma such as the (imprecise) appellation "underclass" (Davey 2020a). Before we move to our arguments, however, we will introduce our field sites and some of the people who live in it: the working-class residents of Britain's postindustrial estates.…”

“…In Davey's research, many debt advice clients spoke of having left debt-collection letters unopened, refusing to answer telephone calls, unplugging their landline phone, and even hiding out of sight. One person reported "barricading yourself inside your home" when bailiffs arrived (see Davey 2019). One over-indebted Woldham resident, Frank, was in arrears on his loan repayments, water bills, and council tax, and (in an earlier life) had engaged in petty crime.…”