2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snapshot of iron response in Shewanella oneidensis by gene network reconstruction

Abstract: Background: Iron homeostasis of Shewanella oneidensis, a γ-proteobacterium possessing high iron content, is regulated by a global transcription factor Fur. However, knowledge is incomplete about other biological pathways that respond to changes in iron concentration, as well as details of the responses. In this work, we integrate physiological, transcriptomics and genetic approaches to delineate the iron response of S. oneidensis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the genes induced by both iron limitation and heavy metal stress (mainly cadmium stress), there are those related to oxidative stress defense (CC0141, CC0994, CC1316), detoxification efflux pumps (CC3195, CC3197), DNA repair (CC2590) and nucleotide biosynthesis (CC0260, CC3492) (Table 3). Interestingly, 12 heat shock genes, encoding chaperones, proteases and small heat shock proteins, were also upregulated by iron limitation, as well as some genes encoding peptidases containing metals as cofactors (Table 3), what is consistent with previous observations in Shewanella oneidensis [38]. Induction of these genes might be directly mediated by the heat shock sigma factor RpoH (σ 32 ), for the reason that the own rpoH gene (CC3098) is upregulated in iron limitation (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the genes induced by both iron limitation and heavy metal stress (mainly cadmium stress), there are those related to oxidative stress defense (CC0141, CC0994, CC1316), detoxification efflux pumps (CC3195, CC3197), DNA repair (CC2590) and nucleotide biosynthesis (CC0260, CC3492) (Table 3). Interestingly, 12 heat shock genes, encoding chaperones, proteases and small heat shock proteins, were also upregulated by iron limitation, as well as some genes encoding peptidases containing metals as cofactors (Table 3), what is consistent with previous observations in Shewanella oneidensis [38]. Induction of these genes might be directly mediated by the heat shock sigma factor RpoH (σ 32 ), for the reason that the own rpoH gene (CC3098) is upregulated in iron limitation (Table 3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparing our microarray data with other large-scale transcriptomic studies performed under iron-limiting condition in bacteria from diverse taxonomic groups [21,28,38,41,42], we observed that, in spite of the multiplicity of regulatory mechanisms, the core of iron-regulated genes is extremely conserved, including mainly those related to transport, use and storage of this metal. Some responses seems to be confined to few bacteria, such as upregulation of the heat shock response, also described in S. oneidensis [38] and downregulation of chemotaxis and motility, observed in S. meliloti [41] and A. baumannii [42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, more free Fe 2ϩ is sequestered by Dps, triggering a requirement for iron. To test this notion, we evaluated the intracellular free-iron content by measuring the expression of the ryhB gene, whose product is a small RNA responding to free Fe 2ϩ to regulate the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism (43,44). The results demonstrated that the ryhB promoter activities of the wild-type and ⌬oxyR strains were not significantly different under the same conditions, suggesting that their free-iron levels are comparable (see Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Signal intensities were quantified and processed using the data analysis pipeline as previously described (Yang et al, 2009;He et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2013). Then processed GeoChip data were analyzed using the following steps: (i) remove the poor quality spots, which were flagged as 1 or 3 by ImaGene (Arrayit, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or with a signal to noise ratio of less than 2.0; (ii) normalize the signal intensity of each spot by dividing the signal intensity by the total intensity of the microarray followed by multiplying by a constant; (iii) transform the data to the natural logarithmic form; and (iv) remove genes detected in only one out of three samples from the same elevation.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%