2017
DOI: 10.1101/226969
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sniff-invariant intensity perception using olfactory bulb coding of inhalation dynamics

Abstract: Summary 9For stable perception of odor intensity, there must exist a neural correlate that is invariant across 10 other parameters, such as the highly variable sniff cycle. Previous hypotheses suggest that variance 11 in inhalation dynamics alters odor concentration profiles in the naris despite a constant 12 environmental concentration. Using whole cell recordings in the olfactory bulb of awake mice, we 13 directly demonstrate that rapid sniffing mimics the effect of odor concentration increase at the level 1… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze whether sniffing changed across learning within the short 500 ms time window of the odor stimulus, we measured nasal flow using an external sensor and quantified the mean inhalation duration (MID) of all inhalations completed within this time window ( Figure 3 A). We chose MID because external measurement of sniffing does not give reliable data about sniff amplitudes (the naris can move relative to the sensor) and because MID correlates with sniff frequency and inhalation slope on a sniff-by-sniff basis—thus, changes in MID also reflect changes in these parameters ( Jordan et al., 2017 ). We again compared five early and five late trials to quantify the change in MID across learning (ΔMID).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze whether sniffing changed across learning within the short 500 ms time window of the odor stimulus, we measured nasal flow using an external sensor and quantified the mean inhalation duration (MID) of all inhalations completed within this time window ( Figure 3 A). We chose MID because external measurement of sniffing does not give reliable data about sniff amplitudes (the naris can move relative to the sensor) and because MID correlates with sniff frequency and inhalation slope on a sniff-by-sniff basis—thus, changes in MID also reflect changes in these parameters ( Jordan et al., 2017 ). We again compared five early and five late trials to quantify the change in MID across learning (ΔMID).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore identified a set of parameters, including five physiological parameters and one morphological parameter, which could reliably predict the cell clusters in recorded cell pairs, despite the physiological variability of some classes. The physiological parameters were chosen to be reliably attainable during well-controlled in vivo experiments as previously shown ( Fukunaga et al, 2012 ; Kollo et al, 2014 ; Jordan et al, 2017 ). We have further included parameters that are less sensitive to series resistance changes occurring during long-duration and in vivo recordings, such as the AHP shape ( Kollo et al, 2014 ) and the AP speed ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Zilien dieser Riechzellen sollen als Geschwindigkeitssensor fungieren. Deren Afferenzen können im Bulbus olfactorius olfaktorisch aktivierte Mitralzellen modulieren und so zu einer chemosensorischen Intensitätskonstanz führen [14]. [31].…”
Section: Ergebnisseunclassified