2007
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkl873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sno/scaRNAbase: a curated database for small nucleolar RNAs and cajal body-specific RNAs

Abstract: Small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) and Cajal body-specific RNAs (scaRNAs) are named for their subcellular localization within nucleoli and Cajal bodies (conserved subnuclear organelles present in the nucleoplasm), respectively. They have been found to play important roles in rRNA, tRNA, snRNAs, and even mRNA modification and processing. All snoRNAs fall in two categories, box C/D snoRNAs and box H/ACA snoRNAs, according to their distinct sequence and secondary structure features. Box C/D snoRNAs and box H/ACA snoR… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eighteen up-regulated transcripts and 388 down-regulated transcripts met these strict criteria and are presented in Dataset S1 and Dataset S2. No matches to small RNAs in snoRNAbase (27) and miRBase (28) were found. The 10 highest ranked up-regulated and 20 highest ranked down-regulated transcripts are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Eighteen up-regulated transcripts and 388 down-regulated transcripts met these strict criteria and are presented in Dataset S1 and Dataset S2. No matches to small RNAs in snoRNAbase (27) and miRBase (28) were found. The 10 highest ranked up-regulated and 20 highest ranked down-regulated transcripts are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The nc transcript annotations were collected from public databases and literature sources (for sources and filtering steps, see Materials and Methods). Briefly, the set includes lncRNAs (n = 4740) from UCSC (Pruitt et al 2009b) and RefSeq (Hsu et al 2006) and intergenic lncRNAs (Cabili et al 2011); antisense RNAs (n = 625) (Chen et al 2004;Engström et al 2006;Ge et al 2008); structural RNAs (n = 131) (Griffiths-Jones et al 2003;Schattner et al 2005;Xie et al 2007); regions with consistent expression evidence in ENCODE RNAseq data sets (n = 4340) (Birney et al 2007); nonexonic ultra conserved elements (n = 331) (Bejerano et al 2004); and long (>60 nt) EvoFold predictions of regions with evolutionarily conserved RNA secondary structure (n = 1599) (Pedersen et al 2006). Given that the array would also be applied in a cancer setting, we included transcripts of cancer-associated pc genes (n = 6856), primarily from the Cancer Gene Index (Suh et al 2010).…”
Section: Expression Platform and Transcript Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. 829 nc transcripts from the Rfam, snoBase, and tRNAscan databases that were at least 60 nucleotides long (Griffiths-Jones et al 2003;Schattner et al 2005;Xie et al 2007). 5.…”
Section: Expression and Conservation Of Noncoding Rnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation and pseudouridylation (C/D and H/ACA box) guide snoRNAs C/D box and H/ACA box snoRNA families guide the 29-Oribose methylations and pseudouridylations, respectively, on rRNAs and spliceosomal snRNAs in vertebrates (Kiss 2001), tRNAs in Archaea (Xie et al 2007), and even probably eukaryotic mRNAs (Cavaille et al 2000;Kishore and Stamm 2006). Among the 31 candidate snoRNAs we identified, 27 were C/D box type and 4 were H/ACA type snoRNAs ( Table 1).…”
Section: Telomerase Rnamentioning
confidence: 99%