“…Indeed, the sensing responses of heterostructured materials discussed in the literature are very disparate and not always related to the p–n semiconductor heterojunction ,,, but could be limited to the core or the shell material. ,, For example, it was demonstrated that although depositing a second material conformally onto already contacted (core–core junctions) 1D SnO 2 nanowires (SnO 2 -core) or carbon nanotubes (CNTs-core) modifies both the width and the thickness of the depletion region at the interface, the sensing responses were exclusively attributed to the core materials. ,, In that case, the shell-layers modified the surface of the already fabricated devices without dramatically modifying the underlying transduction mechanism. ,,,,, Alternatively, a change in the order of device/geometry and materials fabrication (e.g., by adding shell–shell junctions to the core–shell heterojunction and omitting the direct core–core junction) could result in a response related to (i) the shell layer, (ii) the core axis, or (iii) the p–n interface. ,,, A study on CNT-NiO core–shell heterostructures (CSHS) demonstrated that the response was strongly related to the NiO shell . Indeed, when an insulating alumina buffer layer was introduced between the NiO shell and the CNT-core substrate, the transduction mechanism and the response were not affected, but only the baseline resistance of the device increased.…”