1982
DOI: 10.1016/0165-232x(82)90019-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snow water equivalent estimation by microwave radiometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
112
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
112
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that snow grain size and SWE dominate the scattering (Chang et al 1982). Snow density has an effect, although this is much smaller.…”
Section: Microwave Measurement Of Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has been shown that snow grain size and SWE dominate the scattering (Chang et al 1982). Snow density has an effect, although this is much smaller.…”
Section: Microwave Measurement Of Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the snow grains the greater the scattering for a given SWE and so a, in equation 1, is tuned for a particular snow grain size. The value of 1.59 was found by assuming a grain size of 0.35 mm (Chang et al 1982), but as snow grains change through the winter an assumption of constant grain size will cause errors (Kelly et al 2003). Liquid water affects the snow-pack's dielectric constant, increasing attenuation, potentially preventing the retrieval of SWE (Stiles and Ulaby 1980).…”
Section: Microwave Measurement Of Snowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the raw data were first collapsed into a more manageable form. For a given day, the observed snowfall depth was multiplied by a prevalent conversion factor of 0.1 (Chang et al, 1982) to convert the snowfall into its equivalent water depth. The equivalent water depth was added to the observed rainfall on the same day to determine the daily precipitation.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%