2016
DOI: 10.3390/s16101772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNR Degradation in Undersampled Phase Measurement Systems

Abstract: A wide range of measuring applications rely on phase estimation on sinusoidal signals. These systems, where the estimation is mainly implemented in the digital domain, can generally benefit from the use of undersampling to reduce the digitizer and subsequent digital processing requirements. This may be crucial when the application characteristics necessarily imply a simple and inexpensive sensor. However, practical limitations related to the phase stability of the band-pass filter prior digitization establish … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further conversion to distance is straightforward knowing the operating frequency (6 MHz). As can be seen, the emitted and received signals are digitized with a data acquisition card, and thus processing stages are implemented in a PC [ 7 , 8 , 24 ]. A 0.4 m distance between emitter and receiver was set so that SNR does not affect the phase deviation measurement caused by parameter drifts, which is the target of the test conducted here and, consistently, the setup is intended to characterize this effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further conversion to distance is straightforward knowing the operating frequency (6 MHz). As can be seen, the emitted and received signals are digitized with a data acquisition card, and thus processing stages are implemented in a PC [ 7 , 8 , 24 ]. A 0.4 m distance between emitter and receiver was set so that SNR does not affect the phase deviation measurement caused by parameter drifts, which is the target of the test conducted here and, consistently, the setup is intended to characterize this effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As demonstrated in [48], the variance σi2 can be expressed as the inverse of the signal to noise ratio at every anchor (SNRi), and can be modelled as follows σi2=γSNRi=KIR·di4 where the factor γ is proved to be γ=1 [48], di is the Euclidean distance (true value) between bold-italicAbold-italici and T, and KIR is a constant encompassing all parameters of the IR system (including devices, electronics, noise and geometry), as follows:KIR=Pe·As·R·GA·KF·KI/Q·H2η·BWN1…”
Section: Infrared Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For both measuring systems, the precision of the measurement depends significantly on the energy reflected back from the structure and thus on its backscatter properties in the corresponding wavelength band, as the phase measurement accuracy is directly coupled to the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the reflected signal [ 44 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Comparison Of the Sensors For The Contactless Mo...mentioning
confidence: 99%