1997
DOI: 10.1117/12.275799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SNR200 chemically amplified resist optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most engineers face the same question when testing, running-in, and fine-tuning electron beam (e-beam) lithography processes: How do we optimize photoresist processing and exposure conditions to obtain acceptable or, ideally, the best possible results? This is evidenced by the number of published studies that address the optimization of bake, 1 3 exposure, 4 6 and development 7 9 conditions for different resists. In these cases, a single parameter or a set of parameters is tuned to improve the quality of the lithographic process and the resulting photoresist features using proven techniques from optical lithography, such as Bossung plots, 10 contrast curves, 11 and photoresist development models 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most engineers face the same question when testing, running-in, and fine-tuning electron beam (e-beam) lithography processes: How do we optimize photoresist processing and exposure conditions to obtain acceptable or, ideally, the best possible results? This is evidenced by the number of published studies that address the optimization of bake, 1 3 exposure, 4 6 and development 7 9 conditions for different resists. In these cases, a single parameter or a set of parameters is tuned to improve the quality of the lithographic process and the resulting photoresist features using proven techniques from optical lithography, such as Bossung plots, 10 contrast curves, 11 and photoresist development models 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%