2019
DOI: 10.1002/cta.2626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snubberless boost full‐bridge converters: Analysis of soft switching performance and limitations

Abstract: Summary This paper analyses current‐fed (current source) isolated dc‐dc converters that are proposed for various renewable energy and dc microgrid applications, such as photovoltaic, fuel cell, or energy storage systems. The analysis addresses current‐fed (boost) full‐bridge converters that achieve clamping and soft switching without dedicated external auxiliary circuits, such as snubbers or clamps. Such converters have certain limitations that can lead to degraded performance and feasibility due to high circu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the complexity associated with implementation of existing three-phase concepts featuring unfolding rectification, the authors propose to use a configuration of VRU in connection with two isolated current-source converter (CSC) modules for an off-board charging of electric vehicles [31]. To address the common issue of isolated CSCs that is related to transformer leakage inductance, the chosen module is based on the currentsource asymmetric secondary-modulated DC-DC converter (ASMC) topology [32] operating in the PFC mode. The main advantages of the ASMC when compared to other isolated CSC topologies are in low circulating current, constant operating frequency, absence of extra snubbers and the capability to provide desired functionality using only one independent control variable [26].…”
Section: Short Overview Of Prior-art Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the complexity associated with implementation of existing three-phase concepts featuring unfolding rectification, the authors propose to use a configuration of VRU in connection with two isolated current-source converter (CSC) modules for an off-board charging of electric vehicles [31]. To address the common issue of isolated CSCs that is related to transformer leakage inductance, the chosen module is based on the currentsource asymmetric secondary-modulated DC-DC converter (ASMC) topology [32] operating in the PFC mode. The main advantages of the ASMC when compared to other isolated CSC topologies are in low circulating current, constant operating frequency, absence of extra snubbers and the capability to provide desired functionality using only one independent control variable [26].…”
Section: Short Overview Of Prior-art Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Серед типових топологій перетворювачів, що відповідають перерахованим вимогам, можна виділити мостові перетворювачі з проміжною високочастотною ланкою та м'якою [16] або жорсткою комутацією [17], двоспрямований перетворювач без гальванічного розділення з жорсткою комутацією [18].…”
Section: вступunclassified
“…Theoretically, reconfiguration to other topologies, like parallel-resonant converters [32,[36][37][38], is also possible. However, that requires significant changes in the control and strongly affects the regulation capabilities.…”
Section: Reconfiguration Possibilities and Post-failure Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%