2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12954-019-0335-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snus: a compelling harm reduction alternative to cigarettes

Abstract: Snus is an oral smokeless tobacco product which is usually placed behind the upper lip, either in a loose form or in portioned sachets, and is primarily used in Sweden and Norway. The purpose of this review is to examine the reported effects of snus use in relation to specified health effects, namely lung cancer, cardiovascular disease, pancreatic cancer, diabetes, oral cancer and non-neoplastic oral disease. The review also examines the harm reduction potential of snus as an alternative to cigarettes by compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
79
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
79
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies report substantial misperceptions concerning snus, with people incorrectly believing that using snus is equally or more harmful than smoking cigarettes [36][37][38]. However, the epidemiological data from Sweden indicate the people who use snus have substantially lower risks of developing tobacco-related diseases compared to people who smoke cigarettes [39]. If people who are unable to stop using nicotine believe ANDS products, such as e-cigarettes and snus, are equally or more harmful than cigarettes, then they may not make the switch, thereby reducing the public health impact of the nicotine-focused framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies report substantial misperceptions concerning snus, with people incorrectly believing that using snus is equally or more harmful than smoking cigarettes [36][37][38]. However, the epidemiological data from Sweden indicate the people who use snus have substantially lower risks of developing tobacco-related diseases compared to people who smoke cigarettes [39]. If people who are unable to stop using nicotine believe ANDS products, such as e-cigarettes and snus, are equally or more harmful than cigarettes, then they may not make the switch, thereby reducing the public health impact of the nicotine-focused framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, strategies to reduce cigarette smoking are of great importance globally. There is considerable discussion regarding the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy, and safety of the alternative nicotine delivery products such as smokeless tobacco, especially among those who are less likely or unwilling to quit smoking [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sweden, overall tobacco product use is similar to that in other European countries (Clarke et al 2019), but the incidence of smoking-related mortality is among the lowest in Europe (Ferlay et al 2013, Swedish Match 2020. This is because the majority of Swedish tobacco consumers use 'snus', a moist oral smokeless tobacco product (STP), rather than cigarettes (EC 2017, Clarke et al 2019, WHO 2019. In 2017, the population incidence of daily cigarette smoking was reported as approximately 5% in Sweden versus a European average of 25%; in contrast, daily snus use in Sweden was 20% (EC 2017, Clarke et al 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since then, several studies have explored the 'Swedish experience' (Swedish Match 2020) as a potential factor in tobacco harm reduction (e.g., Gartner et al 2007, Clarke et al 2019. In Sweden, overall tobacco product use is similar to that in other European countries (Clarke et al 2019), but the incidence of smoking-related mortality is among the lowest in Europe (Ferlay et al 2013, Swedish Match 2020. This is because the majority of Swedish tobacco consumers use 'snus', a moist oral smokeless tobacco product (STP), rather than cigarettes (EC 2017, Clarke et al 2019, WHO 2019.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%