1989
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/22/14/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SO(2,1)-invariant systems and the Berry phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this adiabatic limit, the invariant I reduces to the adiabatic invariant of the classical DHO [22]. It is quite striking to note that the results obtained herein are similar to the case of the well known and extensively studied [16][17][18][21][22] generalized harmonic oscillator (GHO)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this adiabatic limit, the invariant I reduces to the adiabatic invariant of the classical DHO [22]. It is quite striking to note that the results obtained herein are similar to the case of the well known and extensively studied [16][17][18][21][22] generalized harmonic oscillator (GHO)…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…the DHO and the GHO, where the latter is studied in detail in [18]) can be established through a redefinition of the parameters of the GHO,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adiabatic approximation can be obtained by ignoring terms with two or more time derivatives in equation (2.6) and taking for σ (t) the adiabatic solution [15,18,21],…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The invariants method [3] is very simple due to the relationship between the eigenstates of the invariant operator and the solutions to the Schrödinger equation by means of the phases. Exploiting the invariant operator theory several authors, for instance [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], have studied extensively in the literature two models. One of them is the time-dependent generalized harmonic oscillator with the symmetry of the SU(1, 1) dynamical group, the other is the two-level system possessing an SU(2) symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%