2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SO 2 emissions at Semeru volcano, Indonesia: Characterization and quantification of persistent and periodic explosive activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of SO 2 emission, Bromo is intermediate between the two largest Indonesian volcanoes yet measured, Merapi (timeaverage flux of 120 ± 30 t d − 1 over three decades, range from 50 to Allard, 1986;Allard et al, 1995Allard et al, , 2011Surono et al, 2012) and Anak Krakatau (190 ± 65 t d − 1 ; Bani et al, 2015). Recently, Smekens et al (2015) reported a first SO 2 flux measurement at Semeru volcano (Fig. 1d), just south of Bromo, with an estimated average daily emission of 22-71 t d −1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of SO 2 emission, Bromo is intermediate between the two largest Indonesian volcanoes yet measured, Merapi (timeaverage flux of 120 ± 30 t d − 1 over three decades, range from 50 to Allard, 1986;Allard et al, 1995Allard et al, , 2011Surono et al, 2012) and Anak Krakatau (190 ± 65 t d − 1 ; Bani et al, 2015). Recently, Smekens et al (2015) reported a first SO 2 flux measurement at Semeru volcano (Fig. 1d), just south of Bromo, with an estimated average daily emission of 22-71 t d −1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the UV imaging of ash rich plumes has been acheived, yielding interesting insights into ash phase plume dynamics [48], the reduction in optical thickness caused by ash in these cases rules out the retrieval of SO 2 emissions. Interestingly, these explosive UV camera studies typically point toward the non-explosive release of gas as being the dominant means by which these volcanoes release volatiles to the atmosphere [21,[49][50][51][52][53][54], especially for basaltic open conduit cases, such as Etna and Stromboli in Italy, where gas bubbles are free to move through the melt. Indeed, in the Stromboli case, degassing was partitioned as 77% passive gas release (e.g., from spherical bubbles), 16% from puffing, e.g., from cap bubbles, and with only 7% from explosions, e.g., from gas slugs (Taylor bubbles) [49].…”
Section: Improving the Spatio-temporal Resolution Of Volcanic Degassingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these reports, the subdivision of fluxing between the degassing classes appears to be most strongly tipped towards explosive release (although it is still often dominated by passive degassing) in the scenarios where eruptions are more vulcanian in nature [21,[52][53][54], e.g., the Santiaguito (Guatemala), Asama (Japan), Semeru (Indonesia), and Fuego volcanoes. In particular, Smekens et al [52] suggest, in respect of the Semeru observations, that accumulation and pressurisation beneath a viscous plug are in operation before breach and explosive release.…”
Section: Improving the Spatio-temporal Resolution Of Volcanic Degassingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This goes beyond the capacity provided previously from scanning or traverse-based differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) measurements of volcanic gas fluxes [3,4], firstly by imaging the plumes and therefore providing detailed spatial information, and secondly by acquiring gas fluxes with at least two orders of magnitude higher temporal resolution than most DOAS techniques. In the former case, this is useful in understanding the behaviour of systems with multiple fumaroles or craters [5,6]; in the latter sense, this has enabled capture of a series of rapid explosive and passive volcanic degassing phenomena for the first time [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%