DOI: 10.18130/v38274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

So Happy Together? Combining Rasch and Item Response Theory Model Estimates with Support Vector Machines to Detect Test Fraud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of preknowledge detection, supervised learning involves building a model that predicts the compromise status of items/individuals within a dataset in which compromise status is known, and doing so in a manner that is most likely to generalize to future datasets in which compromise status is not known. Using a variety of item features under Item Response Theory (IRT) models as input variables, Thomas (2016) used support vector machines to identify CI on a certification exam for which approximately 60% of the items were suspected of being compromised. Zopluoglu (2019) used examinees flagged for preknowledge to train an Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm to detect EWP in large-scale testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of preknowledge detection, supervised learning involves building a model that predicts the compromise status of items/individuals within a dataset in which compromise status is known, and doing so in a manner that is most likely to generalize to future datasets in which compromise status is not known. Using a variety of item features under Item Response Theory (IRT) models as input variables, Thomas (2016) used support vector machines to identify CI on a certification exam for which approximately 60% of the items were suspected of being compromised. Zopluoglu (2019) used examinees flagged for preknowledge to train an Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm to detect EWP in large-scale testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%