2020
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

So You Want to Image Myelin Using MRI: An Overview and Practical Guide for Myelin Water Imaging

Abstract: Myelin water imaging (MWI) is an MRI imaging biomarker for myelin. This method can generate an in vivo whole‐brain myelin water fraction map in approximately 10 minutes. It has been applied in various applications including neurodegenerative disease, neurodevelopmental, and neuroplasticity studies. In this review we start with a brief introduction of myelin biology and discuss the contributions of myelin in conventional MRI contrasts. Then the MRI properties of myelin water and four different MWI methods, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
82
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(190 reference statements)
5
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MWF-reading linear correlations could be driven by marked group differences of MWF between good and poor readers, although such an MWF-reading relationship appears to exist within each group (e.g., right thalamus MWF vs. WRAT III in good readers; Figure 5), granted such an assessment is beyond the scope of our small sample size. Our pilot study provides compelling evidence for larger replication studies of myelin in reading and dyslexia using faster MWF imaging techniques yielding more extensive data collection over the whole brain (Alonso-Ortiz et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2020). That said, our average white matter MWF was 0.10 in the good readers, which fits with a very recent report of 0.10-0.11 in adults using the same type of MRI pulse sequence (Ocklenburg et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The MWF-reading linear correlations could be driven by marked group differences of MWF between good and poor readers, although such an MWF-reading relationship appears to exist within each group (e.g., right thalamus MWF vs. WRAT III in good readers; Figure 5), granted such an assessment is beyond the scope of our small sample size. Our pilot study provides compelling evidence for larger replication studies of myelin in reading and dyslexia using faster MWF imaging techniques yielding more extensive data collection over the whole brain (Alonso-Ortiz et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2020). That said, our average white matter MWF was 0.10 in the good readers, which fits with a very recent report of 0.10-0.11 in adults using the same type of MRI pulse sequence (Ocklenburg et al, 2019).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…[36,37] In further work, this has to be compared with conventional methods for assessing these components such as the myelin or extracellular water. [43,45,46] This study has some limitations. Because the lesions were manually segmented, there is a large amount of variation in the annotation, which was also evident in the relatively high intra-observer variability (0.68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[ 36 , 37 ] In further work, this has to be compared with conventional methods for assessing these components such as the myelin or extracellular water. [ 43 , 45 , 46 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%