2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soap-free styrene-acrylic/carbon nanotubes composite latex by in situ emulsion polymerization: Preparation, properties and characterizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gradual increase in electrical conductivity with the increasing MWNT-C amount in the films indicates a uniform distribution of nanotubes within the polymer matrix. Stacking or agglomeration of CNTs in a nanocomposite, especially at high CNT content, traditionally compromises its (nanocomposite) electrical conductivity. , Comparing our work to the literature over the past 15 years, ,,, ,, our electrical conductivity values lie in the highest conductivity range of CNT/polymer composites in general (Figure B) for 3.0 and 5.0 wt %, regardless of the polymer, CNT type, and nanocomposite preparation method. The highest electrical conductivity values reported in the literature are typically obtained based on conventional methods such as solution mixing and melt processing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gradual increase in electrical conductivity with the increasing MWNT-C amount in the films indicates a uniform distribution of nanotubes within the polymer matrix. Stacking or agglomeration of CNTs in a nanocomposite, especially at high CNT content, traditionally compromises its (nanocomposite) electrical conductivity. , Comparing our work to the literature over the past 15 years, ,,, ,, our electrical conductivity values lie in the highest conductivity range of CNT/polymer composites in general (Figure B) for 3.0 and 5.0 wt %, regardless of the polymer, CNT type, and nanocomposite preparation method. The highest electrical conductivity values reported in the literature are typically obtained based on conventional methods such as solution mixing and melt processing.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…It was argued that the crystallinity of the polymer matrix did not affect the conductivity, while the higher conductivity values from the polymer nanocomposite with MWNT were likely caused by the intrinsic quality of MWNT as well as the intrinsic conductive nature of the commercially obtained iPP-g-MA. Li et al 42 studied the emulsion copolymerization of styrene/methyl methacrylate (MMA)/butyl acrylate (BA)/ acrylonitrile/acrylic acid to synthesize a styrene-acrylic copolymer, with hydroxylated MWNT (MWNT-OH) and carboxylated MWNT (MWNT-COOH) used separately as fillers. The MWNT-COOH/copolymer nanocomposite exhibited higher improvement in mechanical performance compared to MWNT-OH/copolymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[26][27][28][29] Butyl acrylate-styrene (BS) emulsion, obtained by emulsion polymerization of rigid monomer styrene (St), soft monomer acrylate (e.g., n-butyl acrylate, BA), 30 has the advantages of good toughness, aging resistance, and high-bonding performance. [31][32][33] It is widely used in external wall coating, building materials, and paper adhesives. Mousavi and co-workers synthesized poly (glycidyl methacrylate-co-styrene) (PGS) emulsions and combined them with soybean flour (SF) to prepare PGS-SF adhesive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Butyl acrylate‐styrene (BS) emulsion, obtained by emulsion polymerization of rigid monomer styrene (St), soft monomer acrylate (e.g., n ‐butyl acrylate, BA), 30 has the advantages of good toughness, aging resistance, and high‐bonding performance 31–33 . It is widely used in external wall coating, building materials, and paper adhesives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%