2015
DOI: 10.1214/14-aop909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobolev differentiable stochastic flows for SDEs with singular coefficients: Applications to the transport equation

Abstract: In this paper, we establish the existence of a stochastic flow of Sobolev diffeomorphismsThe above SDE is driven by a bounded measurable drift coefficientMore specifically, we show that the stochastic flow φs,t(·) of the SDE lives in the spacedenotes a weighted Sobolev space with weight w possessing a pth moment with respect to Lebesgue measure on R d . From the viewpoint of stochastic (and deterministic) dynamical systems, this is a striking result, since the dominant "culture" in these dynamical systems is t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that using analogue techniques as in [30] one could even establish that the strong solution gives rise to a flow of Sobolev diffeomorphisms. This, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Bsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that using analogue techniques as in [30] one could even establish that the strong solution gives rise to a flow of Sobolev diffeomorphisms. This, however, is beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Bsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been proven (see, for example, Fedrizzi and Flandoli [24], Flandoli, Gubinelli and Priola [28] and Mohammed, Nilssen and Proske [44]), that solutions to (1.15) are more regular than their deterministic analogues. For example, [24] shows that, if u 0 ∈ λ≥1 W λ,1 and…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the additive decomposition assumption b(t, ω, x) = b 1 (t, x) + b 2 (t, ω), the analysis of the flow turns out to be much easier than that of the Malliavin derivative considered above. Most of the result of this section will follow as adaptations of some arguments of Mohammed et al [33]. Throughout this section, we denote b n := b 1,n + b 2 where b 1,n : [0, T ] × R → R, is the sequence of smooth functions with compact support approximating b 1 as introduced in the proof of Theorem 1.1, see Step 3.2.2.…”
Section: Stochastic Differentiable Flow For Sdes With Random Driftsmentioning
confidence: 99%