2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.na.2017.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sobolev–Lorentz spaces in the Euclidean setting and counterexamples

Abstract: Abstract. This paper studies the inclusions between different Sobolev-Lorentz spaces W

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We studied the Sobolev-Lorentz spaces and their associated capacities extensively in our previous work. In this paper we extend some of the previous results obtained in our book [6] and in our papers [5] and [7]. In [6] we studied the Sobolev-Lorentz spaces and the associated Sobolev-Lorentz capacities in the Euclidean setting for n ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We studied the Sobolev-Lorentz spaces and their associated capacities extensively in our previous work. In this paper we extend some of the previous results obtained in our book [6] and in our papers [5] and [7]. In [6] we studied the Sobolev-Lorentz spaces and the associated Sobolev-Lorentz capacities in the Euclidean setting for n ≥ 2.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…See (3). Thus, Section 6 together with our paper [7] (see [7,Theorems 3.5,4.3,4.13 and 5.6]) reinforce the fact that for every n ≥ 2 integer and for every Ω ⊂ R n open, the space H 1,(n,1) loc (Ω) is the largest Sobolev-Lorentz space defined on Ω for which each function has a version in C(Ω).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case q = ∞ the functional setting is somewhat delicate, as no Meyer-Serrin type result holds for the corresponding homogeneous spaces. Thus, let us define for 1 ≤ p < ∞ and 1 ≤ q ≤ ∞ the space [10] and Section 2 for more details. Then, surprisingly, we establish the equivalence between (A p,∞ ) and (H p ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us suppose the inequality (A p,q ) is attained at some q < ∞. Following the lines of Section 3, we have at least one radially decreasing maximizer u ∈ D 1 L p,q (R n ), namely a function u such that (10) u p * ,q = p n − p ω (the last inequality is trivial: set v ≡ u, f ≡ |∇u|). It is known that for any f ≥ 0, f ∈ L p,q (Ω) there exists a maximal nonnegative sub-solution v ∈ W 1 L p,q 0 (Ω) of the problem (11) |∇v| ≤ f (see [21] Prop.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%