Social Amplification of Risk in the Internet Environment

Abstract

This article analyzes the dynamic process of risk amplification in the Internet environment with special emphasis on public concern for environmental risks from a high-speed railway tunnel construction project in South Korea. Environmental organizations and activists serving as social stations collected information about the project and its ecological impact, and communicated this with the general public, social groups, and institutions. The Internet provides social stations and the public with an efficient means for interactive communication and an open space for active information sharing and public participation. For example, while the website of an organization such as an environmental activist group can initially trigger local interest, the Internet allows this information to be disseminated to a much wider audience in a manner unavailable to the traditional media. Interaction among social stations demonstrates an amplifying process of public attention to the risk. Analyses of the volume of readers' comments to online newspaper articles and public opinions posted on message board of public and nonprofit organizations show the ripple effects of the amplification process as measured along temporal, geographical, and sectoral dimensions. Public attention is also influenced by the symbolic connotations of risk information. Interpretations of risk in religious, political, or legal terms intensify public concern for the environmental risk.

The worries of weaning: Newspaper reporting of infant weaning and its impact on dialogue in online discussion forums

“…Parents, it seems, are acutely aware of the lack of thoroughness in reporting that the media analysis identified. The individual comments by forum users, though summarised here, were very rich in content, giving an insight into how users felt about the newspaper reporting of the weaning issue and are not simply passive recipients of media messages (Chung, 2011) but use content as 'triggers' to discuss aspects important to them (Laslo et al, 2011). Since most of the comments were angry, reactionary comments to the newspaper articles (in particular newspaper headlines), it seems that the effect of the newspaper reporting on users was to infuriate, rather than inform.…”

Social media in emergency management: Twitter as a tool for communicating risks to the public

“…Indeed, early assessments of social media in risk communication have noted that new issues can be uncovered and quickly result in intensification or attenuation before organisations are able to react or guide to desired actions (Chung, 2011;Veil et al, 2011). Jung and Park (2014) map the dynamic evolution of risk communication networks where intermediary actors clearly act as stations of amplification in terms of diffusing information and mitigating the impact of an outside attack.…”

Digital and social media opportunities for dietary behaviour change

“…In addition, ethical issues remain around the use of publicly available personal information in research (76) . With digital discussions, misinformation and false assertions may be easily disseminated via social media and be widely believed (77) . In addition, such discussions may be more susceptive to social amplification of risk, in which risks assessed by technical experts as relatively minor, elicit strong public concerns that result in substantial impacts on society and economy (78) .…”