2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and biological determinants of reproductive success in Swedish males and females born 1915–1929

Abstract: Studying biological and social determinants of mortality and fertility provides insight into selective pressures in a population and the possibility of trade-offs between short-and long-term reproductive success. Limited data is available from post-demographic transition populations. We studied determinants of reproductive success using multi-generational data from a large, population-based cohort of 13 666 individuals born in Sweden between 1915 and 1929. We studied the effects of birthweight for gestational … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
54
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach towards uncovering the complexity of factors affecting fitness lies in investigating the means, whereby various wealth types influence subsequent outcomes. For example, a remarkable dataset that provides social and biological variables at birth for a Swedish cohort born between 1915 and 1925 Goodman & Koupil [16] shows how biological (embodied) factors operate through social pathways. The advantage of such an analysis is that it allows clear specification of how, in the Swedish case, biological factors (such as birth weight) influence fitness through social processes (such as marriage), or alternatively how material factors (such as wealth) might influence embodied outcomes (such as weight or height) that subsequently affect fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach towards uncovering the complexity of factors affecting fitness lies in investigating the means, whereby various wealth types influence subsequent outcomes. For example, a remarkable dataset that provides social and biological variables at birth for a Swedish cohort born between 1915 and 1925 Goodman & Koupil [16] shows how biological (embodied) factors operate through social pathways. The advantage of such an analysis is that it allows clear specification of how, in the Swedish case, biological factors (such as birth weight) influence fitness through social processes (such as marriage), or alternatively how material factors (such as wealth) might influence embodied outcomes (such as weight or height) that subsequently affect fitness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this cohort, we have previously demonstrated that social and biological characteristics at birth predict school performance and entrance to higher education (Unpublished data under submission: A. Goodman, M. D. Gisselmann, I. Koupil). We have also previously shown that characteristics at birth and higher education both predict subsequent marriage and reproductive success 33 . In this paper we therefore address the following research questions: 1) Is school performance associated with subsequent marriage and/or reproductive success (completed number of children and grandchildren)?…”
Section: Hypotheses and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low levels of fertility found in post-demographic transition societies appear to be maladaptive, occurring as they do alongside radical increases in material wealth, nutrition, and modern healthcare, which should allow parents to raise larger families [91]. While increasing investment in individual children could be adaptive if it puts them at a long-term advantage in survival and/or reproduction [58,78,80,81,92], empirical tests of increasing scope and sophistication have found that short-term reproductive success is consistently correlated with longer-term reproductive success after two to four generations [72,[93][94][95]. Such studies also find that while low fertility decreases reproductive success, it substantially increases the socio-economic success of descendants (e.g.…”
Section: (B) Empirical Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%