2017
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/254/19/192003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and economic importance of textile reuse and recycling in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a great potential for the textile recycling sector to contribute to the circular economy ( Baruque-Ramos et al, 2017). It can reduce the production of new textiles from virgin materials and hence reduce the use of water, energy and chemicals in the production chain (Dahlbo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is a great potential for the textile recycling sector to contribute to the circular economy ( Baruque-Ramos et al, 2017). It can reduce the production of new textiles from virgin materials and hence reduce the use of water, energy and chemicals in the production chain (Dahlbo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil there are several projects, brands and stylists working with upcycling in fashion (Table 2). In general, these projects aim to add value and empower consumers, suppliers and involved workers, as well as to reduce waste by reusing and recycling (Baruque-Ramos et al, 2017). These outcomes contribute to improving the quality of life of citizens and bring economic benefits.…”
Section: Examples Illustrating the Socio-economic Advantages Of Textimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This approach also fails to recognize the massive socio-cultural change that a CE entails by transforming consumption and production structures based on materialism, convenience, and ownership to ones based on collaborative consumption, sharing economies and usevalue (Frenken, 2017;Hobson, 2019;Lazarevic and Valve, 2017;Pomponi and Moncaster, 2017). When some of those social and cultural topics are addressed in the literature, it is dominantly done through commercial approaches, such as new business models for the private sector rather than from the perspective of a transformative social and solidarity economy (with some notable exceptions such as Baruque-Ramos et al, 2017;Chaves Ávila and Monzón Campos, 2018;Gutberlet et al, 2017;Hobson and Lynch, 2016;Moreau et al, 2017;Schröder et al, 2019a). Yet this is a key topic as evidenced by the work of Kirchherr et al, (2018) which found that practitioners see cultural barriers as the main barriers to a CE transition.…”
Section: Energy Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%