1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf02382270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and environmental influences on self-aggression in monkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It appeared that visitors excited the animals so that they a) were more active and less inactive, b) directed less amicable/affiiative behavior towards one another, and c) were more socially aggressive. This pattern of behavior change suggests that the stimulation caused by visitors is an irritable one, in that it leads to similar patterns of behavior change (e.g., increases in aggression) as commonly found with types of stimulation characterized as frustrating, threatening, or competitive [Baer, 1971;Chamove et al, 1984;Cooper and Markowitz, 1979;Mather, 19811. It further suggests that visitor stimulation is unlike that of forms of positive stimulation or enrichment, such as tasks which generally lead to reductions in aggression [Anderson and Chamove, 1981;Chamove et al, 1982;Markowitz, 19821. Our results support and extend the findings of Glatston et al [1984] except that they reported the "impression" that tamarins appeared to be less active when visitors were present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It appeared that visitors excited the animals so that they a) were more active and less inactive, b) directed less amicable/affiiative behavior towards one another, and c) were more socially aggressive. This pattern of behavior change suggests that the stimulation caused by visitors is an irritable one, in that it leads to similar patterns of behavior change (e.g., increases in aggression) as commonly found with types of stimulation characterized as frustrating, threatening, or competitive [Baer, 1971;Chamove et al, 1984;Cooper and Markowitz, 1979;Mather, 19811. It further suggests that visitor stimulation is unlike that of forms of positive stimulation or enrichment, such as tasks which generally lead to reductions in aggression [Anderson and Chamove, 1981;Chamove et al, 1982;Markowitz, 19821. Our results support and extend the findings of Glatston et al [1984] except that they reported the "impression" that tamarins appeared to be less active when visitors were present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies also indicate that other risk factors for abnormal behavior such as stereotypic behavior (motor, postural, and self-stimulation) include individual housing and long time in individual housing (Anonymous, 2004;Bushong, Schapiro, & Bloomsmith, 1992;Chamove, Anderson, & Nash, 1984;Line, Morgan, Markowitz, Roberts, & Riddell, 1990;Lutz et al, 2003;Novak, 2003;Reinhardt, 1999) as well as a high number of blood draws (Lutz et al, 2003). Indeed, animals in individual housing most severely experience a lack of control over their environment, a condition that has been linked to the development of abnormal behaviors across species (Broom, 1991).…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA has been less intensively studied in group-living monkeys, and the influence of factors such as frustration in social contexts on the expression of SA is consequently less clear. For example, the hypothesis that subordinate monkeys are more susceptible to frustration because of a lack of suitable social targets and that this should increase SA, has not received convincing support (ANDERSON & CHAMOVE, 1980;CHAMOVE et al, 1985). On the other hand, it is well established that situations increasing SA in individually tested monkeys are less effective with socially tested animals (CHAMOVE et al, 1984), due, in at least some cases, to the replacement of SA by other behaviours such as grooming (GoOSEN & RIBBENS, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Frustration has been identified as one of the proximal causes of self-aggression (SA) in individually tested monkeys, for example during extinction of an operantly conditioned response (GLUCK & SACKETT, 1974), or when attractive food is placed just out of reach (CHAMOVE et al, 1984). SA has been less intensively studied in group-living monkeys, and the influence of factors such as frustration in social contexts on the expression of SA is consequently less clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%