Urban Fuel Poverty 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-816952-0.00007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and health-related indicators of energy poverty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical variables within the social dimension are generally qualitative in nature as they mainly represent people´s subjective perceptions and experiences under the condition of energy poverty and vulnerability. However, these are sometimes quantitatively accounted for through proxy values (see, e.g., Boltz and Pichler [102], Golubchikov and O'Sullivan [103], Longhurst and Hargreaves [104], Ruse et al [105]and Waddams Price et al [96]). Among them, we found exclusion, social distribution, poverty and deprivation, state of social recognition, standard of living, household satisfaction, family structure (one-child / large families), traditions, rural/urban context characteristics, participation in decision making, social networks dynamics, gender, health and safety, and historical trajectories.…”
Section: Social Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical variables within the social dimension are generally qualitative in nature as they mainly represent people´s subjective perceptions and experiences under the condition of energy poverty and vulnerability. However, these are sometimes quantitatively accounted for through proxy values (see, e.g., Boltz and Pichler [102], Golubchikov and O'Sullivan [103], Longhurst and Hargreaves [104], Ruse et al [105]and Waddams Price et al [96]). Among them, we found exclusion, social distribution, poverty and deprivation, state of social recognition, standard of living, household satisfaction, family structure (one-child / large families), traditions, rural/urban context characteristics, participation in decision making, social networks dynamics, gender, health and safety, and historical trajectories.…”
Section: Social Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical variables within the social dimension are generally qualitative in nature as they mainly represent people´s subjective perceptions and experiences under the condition of energy poverty and vulnerability. However, these are sometimes quantitatively accounted for through proxy values (see, e.g., Boltz and Pichler [102], Golubchikov and O'Sullivan [103], Longhurst and Hargreaves [104], Ruse et al [105]and Waddams Price et al [96]). Among them, we found exclusion, social distribution, poverty and deprivation, state of social recognition, standard of living, household satisfaction, family structure (one-child / large families), traditions, rural/urban context characteristics, participation in decision making, social networks dynamics, gender, health and safety, and historical trajectories.…”
Section: Social Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%