Social and institutional factors as determinants of economic growth: Evidence from the United States counties

Abstract

In the search for explanations of persistent differences in economic growth rates, the conditional convergence growth model has introduced the possibility of incorporating a wide set of factors as determinants of growth. Controlling for spatial dependence, we assess the contribution of differences in social and institutional variables on growth rates of per capita income for counties in the United States. The empirical results indicate that, ceteris paribus, social and institutional variables explain some of the differences in convergence rates among counties. In particular, (i) ethnic diversity is associated with faster rates of economic growth; (ii) higher levels of income inequality are associated with lower rates; and (iii) higher levels of social capital have a positive effect on economic growth rates. JEL classification: O40, R11

The impact of social capital on crime: Evidence from the Netherlands

“…In a similar vein Alesina and La Ferrara (2000) argue that racial composition affects the degree in participation in social activities. Zak and Knack (2001) and Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater (2002) also show that higher levels of ethnic diversity may result in less trusting societies.…”

Determinants of Income Growth in Metropolitan and Nonmetropolitan Labor Markets

“…Hammond and Thompson (2006), Hammond (2006), Hammond (2004), Henry, Barkley, andLi (2004), Huang, Orazem, andWohlgemuth (2002), Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater (2002), Beeson, DeJong, and Troesken (2001), Nissan and Carter (1999), and Carlino and Mills (1987) explore the issue of growth in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas, using a variety of empirical approaches including distribution dynamics, time-series methods, spatial distribution dynamics, cross-section regressions, and trends in cross-section standard deviations.…”

“…Further, studies that focus exclusively on metropolitan areas or cities may suffer from sample selection bias. To remedy this, Hammond and Thompson (2006), Hammond (2006), Hammond (2004), Henry, Barkley, and Li (2004), Huang, Orazem, and Wohlgemuth (2002), Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater (2002), Beeson, DeJong, and Troesken (2001), Nissan and Carter (1999), and Carlino and Mills (1987) investigated convergence and growth issues us-1 In 1969, the commuting zone region with the highest per capita personal income was Nantucket County, Massachusetts ($5,111). The commuting zone region with the lowest income was Maverick County, Texas ($1,349).…”

Can food availability influence economic growth - the case of African countries

“…Policy makers in Russia should look into other exports, rather than solely relying on the oil export as a source for economic growth. Furthermore, Rupasingha et al (2002) have identified both social and institutional factors for different states within the United States that are important factors with regard to explaining the difference in convergence rates amongst the states. In particular, these are the ethnic diversity and the high social capital.…”