1964
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.121.5.482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social and Psychological Effects of Vasectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two published reports that emphasize this relationship are those of Erickson 9 and Johnson. 10 Erickson's 6 cases are gathered from his psychotherapeutic practice. He describes men who chose the operation for clearly symbolic and selfmutilative reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two published reports that emphasize this relationship are those of Erickson 9 and Johnson. 10 Erickson's 6 cases are gathered from his psychotherapeutic practice. He describes men who chose the operation for clearly symbolic and selfmutilative reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several detailed post-facto clinical reports in the literature point out instances of sexual pathologic and psychopathologic conditions in men who had undergone vasectomy and attribute the precipitation of symptoms to the operation. 2 ' »• 10 3. What are the typical "trouble spots" before, during, and after the operation, and how can the physician best assist the patient in coping with them?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-seven of the men were satisfied with the results of the operation. Johnson (1964) used a sample which included only persons who were hospitalized psychiatric patients at a Veterans Administration Hospital and who reported a vasectomy prior to admission. It is not clear how the results of this study can be applied to the general population.…”
Section: Influence Of Vasectomy On Sexual Function and Attitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few follow-ups of vasectomized patients reported in the literature but they are studies of special American groups, such as criminals, the retarded, or psychiatric patients (Popenoe, 1929;Johnson, 1964), are rather personal and anecdotal in nature (Garrison and Gamble, 1950;Poffenberger and Poffenberger, 1963;Landis and Poffenberger, 1965), are psychiatric and psychosocial, that is examine motivation and guilt feelings (Rodgers, Ziegler, Rohr, and Prentiss, 1963;Rodgers, Ziegler, Altrocchi, and Levy, 1965;Ziegler, Rodgers, and Kriegsman, 1966;Ziegler and Rodgers, 1968;Ziegler, Rodgers, and Prentiss, 1969), or are studies of groups in developing countries (Apte and Gandhi, 1970;Sharma, 1170;Sundaram, 1970). Furthermore, only the husband was interviewed in these studies, except for the work of Ziegler, et al (1968) who interviewed husband and wife in a comparison of couples who used vasectomy with couples who used oral contraception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lors de grossesses adultérines, il faut savoir que l'enfant n'est pas protégé par les lois familiales. L'étude de Johnson [15] est significa tive à l'égard des séquelles psychiques, familiales et sociales: sur 83 cas, 7 regrets, 5 grossesses adultérines, 11 patients hospitalisés dans la même année pour affection psychiatrique, 20 divorces (= 25%). (20-30%), comparé à celui des stérilisations féminines: 70% d'après un travail récent que nous avons fait à partir des cas de notre ser vice [25], La dénomination de succès implique ici la notion de grossesse.…”
Section: Les Avantages Et Les Inconvénientsunclassified