2020
DOI: 10.1002/pchj.339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social anhedonia across mental disorders: A validation study of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale

Abstract: The present study validated the Chinese version of the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS) in a group of patients with mental disorders. The results replicated the four-factor structure of the ACIPS in a Chinese setting and showed good discrimination validity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of total ACIPS mean scores, we observed lower mean scores in our Korean sample compared to other communitybased adult samples, whether in the US (Bedwell et al, 2014;Gooding et al, 2015) or in China (Liang et al, 2020). We tried to identify reasons for the apparent differences in the mean total ACIPS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of total ACIPS mean scores, we observed lower mean scores in our Korean sample compared to other communitybased adult samples, whether in the US (Bedwell et al, 2014;Gooding et al, 2015) or in China (Liang et al, 2020). We tried to identify reasons for the apparent differences in the mean total ACIPS scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Social anhedonia is also observed among several other forms of psychopathology (Barkus and Badcock, 2019;Liang et al, 2020;Gooding and Pflum, 2022). Currently, there is strong evidence that social anhedonia is a state-related symptom in patients with depressive disorder, though there are increasing reports of social anhedonia in autism, eating disorders, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and substance use disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, evidence suggests that either a three-or four-factor model is more appropriate Pflum, 2014a, 2016;Chan et al, 2016;Gooding et al, 2016a;Chaix et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2022). Lately, researchers validated the structure of the ACIPS in a mixed clinical sample (including 294 patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder), replicated the four-factor structure of the ACIPS in a Chinese setting, and showed good discrimination validity (Liang et al, 2020). Consistent with that, in this study, the results of a confirmatory factor analysis indicate that a four-factor solution provides an appropriate fit in the Chinese OCD patient sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ACIPS has been administered to many patient groups, including patients with depressive disorder, schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, and autism, etc. (Ritsner et al, 2018;Han G. T., et al, 2019;Liang et al, 2020;Balasingam et al, 2023). The ACIPS has shown great validity (Gooding et al, 2014;Gooding and Pflum, 2014b;Gooding et al, 2015).These attributes made ACIPS a potentially helpful tool for elucidating how individual differences relate to risk for various forms of psychopathology linked to social relationship deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the section on affective, cognitive, and clinical manifestations of transdiagnostic groups, the paper by Liang et al () introduces a theory‐driven checklist, the Anticipatory and Consummatory Interpersonal Pleasure Scale (ACIPS; Gooding & Pflum, ), to capture interpersonal pleasure in a large group of patients with schizophrenia, major depressive disorders, and bipolar disorders in Chinese settings. Their findings demonstrate the robust four‐factor structure of the ACIPS, which was also found in a non‐clinical Chinese sample (Chan, Yang, Li, Xie, & Gooding, ) covering friendship, family and intimacy‐related relationships, general social interactions, and casual interactions/conversations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%