2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Social Anxiety Disorder Carved at its Joints”: Evidence for the taxonicity of social anxiety disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
10
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current results are in line with evidence that SAD symptoms (Reilly, Carleton, & Weeks, 2011) and FNE both have a latent taxonic structure that results in people with SAD being quantitatively and qualitatively different from people without SAD (Kollman, Brown, Liverant, & Hofmann, 2006;Weeks, Carleton, Asmundson, McCabe, & Antony, 2010). In comparing the various diagnostic groups, there was clear evidence in line with current models (Clark & Wells, 1995;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997) that people diagnosed with SAD consistently report significant and robustly higher levels of FNE relative to all other diagnostic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The current results are in line with evidence that SAD symptoms (Reilly, Carleton, & Weeks, 2011) and FNE both have a latent taxonic structure that results in people with SAD being quantitatively and qualitatively different from people without SAD (Kollman, Brown, Liverant, & Hofmann, 2006;Weeks, Carleton, Asmundson, McCabe, & Antony, 2010). In comparing the various diagnostic groups, there was clear evidence in line with current models (Clark & Wells, 1995;Rapee & Heimberg, 1997) that people diagnosed with SAD consistently report significant and robustly higher levels of FNE relative to all other diagnostic groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Firstly, there is evidence that the structure of social anxiety disorder is best conceptualized as a dimensional distribution and not as a categorical classification (Kollman, Brown, Liverant, & Hofmann, 2006;Weeks, Norton, & Heimberg, 2009). In contrast, a recent study conducted by Weeks, Carleton, Asmundson, McCabe, and Antony (2010) found evidence for considering social anxiety disorders as having a taxonic latent structure. Taking a sample from the general population allows the assessment of a large range of social anxiety, whereas a clinical sample would only take into consideration high levels of socially anxious characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research provides strong evidence that social anxiety is best conceptualized as a dimensional construct, and definitions of clinically significant severity are arbitrary (e.g., Kollman, Brown, Liverant, & Hofmann, 2006; Ruscio, 2010; Weeks, Carleton, Asmundson, McCabe, & Antony, 2010). Our research can thus be viewed as further interpersonal approaches to social anxiety and social anxiety disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%