2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.640599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Attention Deficits in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Task Dependence of Objects vs. Faces Observation Bias

Abstract: Social attention deficits represent a central impairment of patients suffering from autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but the nature of such deficits remains controversial. We compared visual attention regarding social (faces) vs. non-social stimuli (objects), in an ecological diagnostic context, in 46 children and adolescents divided in two groups: ASD (N = 23) and typical neurodevelopment (TD) (N = 23), matched for chronological age and intellectual performance. Eye-tracking measures of visual scanning, while … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional elements may have contributed to this ceiling effect such as the task participants had to perform along with the procedure and type of stimuli used (i.e., dynamic prototypical facial expression displayed by avatars, with long exposure, morphed expression with maximal intensity expressivity), which may have facilitated the recognition of facial expressions for children with ASD in the present study. Previous studies have highlighted the impact of those type elements [i.e., type of the task, nature of the stimuli (e.g., static vs dynamic), intensity of expressions] on facial expression processing in individuals with ASD ( Speer et al, 2007 ; Guillon et al, 2014 ; Mouga et al, 2021 ; Nagy et al, 2021 ). Future studies on similar issues should carefully consider those elements in order to produce enough variation to optimize the evaluation of an effect, for example by increasing the presentation speed ( Matsumoto and Hwang, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional elements may have contributed to this ceiling effect such as the task participants had to perform along with the procedure and type of stimuli used (i.e., dynamic prototypical facial expression displayed by avatars, with long exposure, morphed expression with maximal intensity expressivity), which may have facilitated the recognition of facial expressions for children with ASD in the present study. Previous studies have highlighted the impact of those type elements [i.e., type of the task, nature of the stimuli (e.g., static vs dynamic), intensity of expressions] on facial expression processing in individuals with ASD ( Speer et al, 2007 ; Guillon et al, 2014 ; Mouga et al, 2021 ; Nagy et al, 2021 ). Future studies on similar issues should carefully consider those elements in order to produce enough variation to optimize the evaluation of an effect, for example by increasing the presentation speed ( Matsumoto and Hwang, 2011 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, attention to faces has been shown to be task dependent in individuals with autism. Mouga et al (2021) demonstrated that attention allocation in people with ASD became normalised when they had to narrate what was happening in a story book, as opposed to a simple description of a picture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is an early-onset neurodevelopmental condition characterized by significant impairments in social interaction and communication, restricted interests, and repetitive and stereotyped behaviors [ 1 ]. Although the complexity of this condition involves several abilities and learning impairments, a social interaction deficit is considered the core symptom for its impact on adaptation to surrounding environments across the lifespan of an individual and for its cascading effects on all other neurodevelopmental domains [ 2 , 3 ]. It is now well established from a variety of studies that parents or caregivers of ASD children have an increasing risk of high stress levels and psychosocial problems [ 4 , 5 ], and that the severity of ASD symptoms is one of the most important factors affecting the caregiver burden in this population [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%