Social attractiveness perception of a cleft lip repair in an adolescent via eye-tracking

Hartmann, Giovani Ceron; Guimarães, Lara Karolina; Maggioni, C.; Gasparello, Gil Guilherme; Júnior, Sergio Luiz Mota; Pithon, Matheus Melo; Tanaka, Orlando

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2022.01.007

Cited by 11 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Only two studies 21,27 used eyetracking glasses rather than screen-based eye-trackers. Chin-rests were used less than half of the time [six studies used chin-rests, 16,[22][23][24]26,30 eight studies did not use chinrests, 15,[17][18][19][20]25,28,29 and two were not applicable (glasses) 21,27 ]. The distance to the screen ranged from 50 to 75 cm; however, this can be dictated by the model of eye-tracker.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All selected studies reported duration of fixation in AOIs, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] whereas 10 (62.5%) also reported fixation counts in each AOI. 15,17,21,23,24,[26][27][28][29][30] Only eight (50%) studies 19,20,[22][23][24][25][26]29 reported time to first fixation 26,29 (time it took the participant to gaze at target AOI) or initial attention capture 19,20,[22][23][24][25] (first AOI participant gazed at upon stimulus display) data. Three studies 15,25,29 (18.8%) reported fixation sequence/scanpath data (path the eyes moved in while viewing the image) and six 15,18,20,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When looking at the eye-tracking outcomes of all papers in general, there was longer duration and number of fixations around the lips and nose of images of individuals with a −CL+ /−P. 15,16,18,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Furthermore, for non-CL+/−P facial images, there was increased fixation on the eyes, which was sacrificed in −CL+/−P images. 15,16,18,[22][23][24][25] Initial fixation locations followed a similar pattern, with the lip being the first fixation in CL+/−P images and the eyes being the first in non-CL+/−P images.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[23][24][25] Finally, common metrics of data reporting 6 in eyetracking were assessed in the studies selected. All selected studies reported duration of fixation in AOIs, [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] whereas 10 (62.5%) also reported fixation counts in each AOI. 15,17,21,23,24,[26][27][28][29][30] Only eight (50%) studies 19,20,[22][23][24][25][26]29 reported time to first fixation 26,29 (time it took the participant to gaze at target AOI) or initial attention capture 19,20,[22][23][24][25] (first AOI participant gazed at upon stimulus display) data.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although 10 publications 15,17,18,20,22,23,25,[28][29][30] asked participants directly to provide a score or asked them questions in addition to the eye-tracking, only four 18,22,28,30 publications provided a comparison of this data to eyetracking data. Of note, Warne et al 19 compared their eye-tracking data to Asher-McDade scores provided by two plastic surgeons who did not participate in eyetracking.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Use of Eye-tracking Technology in Cleft Lip: A Literature Review

Plonkowski

Breakey

Read

et al. 2023

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Eye-tracking has become an increasingly popular research tool within the field of cleft lip and/or palate (CL+/−P). Despite this, there are no standardized protocols for conducting research. Our objective was to conduct a literature review of the methodology and outcomes of previous publications using eye-tracking in CL+/−P. Methods: The PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify all articles published up to August 2022. All articles were screened by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria included using eye-tracking, image stimuli of CL+/−P, and outcome reporting using areas of interest (AOIs). Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, conference articles, and image stimuli of conditions other than CL+/−P. Results: Forty articles were identified, and 16 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Thirteen studies only displayed images of individuals following cleft lip surgery with three only displaying unrepaired cleft lips. Significant variation was found in study design, particularly in the AOIs used to report gaze outcomes. Ten studies asked participants to provide an outcome score alongside eye-tracking; however, only four compared outcome data to eye-tracking data. This review is primarily limited by the minimal number of publications in this area. Conclusions: Eye-tracking can be a powerful tool in evaluating appearance outcomes following CL+/−P surgery. It is currently limited by the lack of standardized research methodology and varied study design. Before future work, a replicable protocol should be developed to maximize the potential of this technology.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Use of Eye-tracking Technology in Cleft Lip: A Literature Review

Plonkowski

Breakey

Read

et al. 2023

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Nasal tip alterations and their impact on perceived aesthetics and self-esteem: an eye-tracking and questionnaire-based study

Tanaka,

Hartmann,

Gasparello

et al. 2024

Eur J Plast Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of the impact of orthodontists’ smile with malocclusions on social media and professional credibility

Bark,

Gasparello,

Hartmann

et al. 2024

Clin Oral Invest

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate perceptions of the credibility of orthodontists with malocclusions and whether these affect the willingness of laypeople to become patients through eye-tracking technology and a questionnaire.Materials and methods Ninety-ve lay raters are evaluated through eye tracking and a questionnaire comprising 12 images of orthodontists with malocclusions. The malocclusions selected through the Orthodontic Treatment Need Index (IOTN) groups are: IOTN grade 1 (close to the ideal), 3 (anterior crowding), and 5 (with diastemas). Eye-tracking data are collected for the xation points, and credibility was analyzed through questionnaires. A word cloud was generated on the Mentimeter platform. To validate the study and conduct a reliability test, the questionnaire was conducted twice during the preliminary stage of data collection.Results IOTN 1 received a better evaluation for credibility and competence and shows a signi cant difference when compared to IOTN 3 (p < 0.001) and 5 (p < 0.001). In addition, raters felt more con dent in installing an orthodontic treatment appliance, if necessary, with an IOTN 1 orthodontist compared to IOTNs 3 and 5. For the xation points, a difference was seen, since the attention of the individuals for IOTN 1 was divided between the eyes and the mouth, while for IOTN 3 and 5, the raters paid more attention to the mouth. The word cloud showed that the raters for IOTN 3 and 5 repeat the words "crooked teeth" and "spacing" most often.Conclusion Orthodontists with IOTN 1 were perceived as more competent, reliable, and professional, and laypeople are more likely to become their patients.Clinical signi cance The professionals' smiles play a large role in laypeople's decision to select them as their orthodontist, and strategic use of social media, can bring health information to many more people more rapidly and directly.

show abstract

Social attractiveness perception of a cleft lip repair in an adolescent via eye-tracking

Cited by 11 publications

References 23 publications

The Use of Eye-tracking Technology in Cleft Lip: A Literature Review

The Use of Eye-tracking Technology in Cleft Lip: A Literature Review

Nasal tip alterations and their impact on perceived aesthetics and self-esteem: an eye-tracking and questionnaire-based study

Evaluation of the impact of orthodontists’ smile with malocclusions on social media and professional credibility

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About