Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology 2002
DOI: 10.1002/0471214426.pas0318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Behavior

Abstract: To understand the interplay between individuals and social context, social psychology must span levels of analysis. At the social level, social psychology examines how the behavior and attitudes of individuals are influenced by social factors. At the cognitive level, it addresses how the individual interprets, evaluates, and ascribes meaning to the social world. At the biological level, social psychology examines individuals as biological entities whose physiology influences, and is influenced by, social life.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 323 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative magnitude of these influences may vary, depending on a host of factors, including the domain under consideration-as is the case for nature and nurture, genes and environment, the person and the situation, and other familiar theoretical dualisms. More important, as we have long understood from the biopychosocial model (Cacioppo & Berntson, 1992a, b;Cacioppo, Berntson, & McClintock, 2000;Crawford, Luka, & Cacioppo, 2002;Engel, 1977Engel, , 1980, biological and social influences interact, with each other and with behavior, in a relation that Bandura characterized as reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1978; see also Kihlstrom, in press). The issue addressed here is not whether biology influences mind and behavior, much less the magnitude of that influence compared to others.…”
Section: Two Kinds Of Constraint: a Clarificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative magnitude of these influences may vary, depending on a host of factors, including the domain under consideration-as is the case for nature and nurture, genes and environment, the person and the situation, and other familiar theoretical dualisms. More important, as we have long understood from the biopychosocial model (Cacioppo & Berntson, 1992a, b;Cacioppo, Berntson, & McClintock, 2000;Crawford, Luka, & Cacioppo, 2002;Engel, 1977Engel, , 1980, biological and social influences interact, with each other and with behavior, in a relation that Bandura characterized as reciprocal determinism (Bandura, 1978; see also Kihlstrom, in press). The issue addressed here is not whether biology influences mind and behavior, much less the magnitude of that influence compared to others.…”
Section: Two Kinds Of Constraint: a Clarificationmentioning
confidence: 99%