2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-018-9647-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Book Search: a survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are also aligned with the previous research findings on books, in that they showed that user reviews provide a better signal for topical relevance and effectively improve the search results, compared to professional metadata (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012; Zhang et al ., 2016; Kumar et al ., 2019). Social information effectively improve the retrieval of relevant books (Kumar and Pamula, 2020). This could be related to the fact that comments are of a broader capacity and hence provide more details about different aspects of an item including its content, quality, contributions and writing style (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study are also aligned with the previous research findings on books, in that they showed that user reviews provide a better signal for topical relevance and effectively improve the search results, compared to professional metadata (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012; Zhang et al ., 2016; Kumar et al ., 2019). Social information effectively improve the retrieval of relevant books (Kumar and Pamula, 2020). This could be related to the fact that comments are of a broader capacity and hence provide more details about different aspects of an item including its content, quality, contributions and writing style (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%