Social bots in political communication

Vasilkova, Valeriya V.; Валентиновна, Василькова Валерия; Легостаева, Н. И.; Игоревна, Легостаева Наталья

doi:10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-1-121-133

Cited by 17 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…e existing assessment of the quality of poetry generation is mainly conducted manually, usually based on four evaluation criteria: fluency, coherence, metricality, and meaning [6,10,11], which mainly consider the fluency, coherence, metricality, and meaning of the generated poems, i.e., whether the metricality is qualified, whether the verses are fluent, whether the verses are coherently related, and whether the verses have content and meaning. Combined with studies related to the literary aspects of literature, it is found that the evaluation of literature from these four criteria only is one-sided, as shown in Figure 6 the probability of the distribution of literary vocabulary; the above four criteria can be said to be the most basic requirements for generating sentences that can be called poetry, and a qualified poem, in addition to the basic requirements such as semantic coherence, flatness, and rhyme, the context/ emotion of the poem is more important, and contextual interplay is the most appropriate criterion for evaluating poetry e most appropriate criterion for evaluating a poem is the blending of moods and emotions [5]. erefore, in this paper, based on the existing manual evaluation criteria for poetry, we add two evaluation indicators of mood/emotion and tangency e improved manual evaluation criteria are shown in Table 1.…”

Section: Manual Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison and Research on the Applicability of Combining Information of Chinese and Foreign Literary Genres Based on Data Analysis

Xing

Lü²,

Chen

et al. 2022

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Western literature has a later history of factual connection with Chinese literature, and the resources for empirical research are far less abundant than in other Eastern countries. It is also because Western culture is a different cultural system from Eastern and Chinese cultures, which also lends itself to parallel studies that seek common ground in differences and see differences in the same. In this paper, we will mainly compare Chinese and Western literature from the perspective of the lack of factual relationship between Chinese and foreign literature and explore the integration and development of the national traditional literature by combining computer algorithms.

show abstract

Section: Manual Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is hard to imagine that a particular country or nation could build its own sublime literary temples on the ruins of its culture. It is hard to imagine that any one nation or people could build its own sublime literary temples on cultural ruins [4,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison and Research on the Applicability of Combining Information of Chinese and Foreign Literary Genres Based on Data Analysis

Xing

Lü²,

Chen

et al. 2022

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…First classification criteria for social bots is a field of activity where the bots are used. Among them we highlight the most significant -politics [14,16,17,20,22,25,26], marketing [15,17,18], social problems solutions [2,12,19,24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Bots As an Instrument of Influence in Social Networks: Typologization Problems

Vasilkova

Легостаева

2021

KSS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, in the field of social bots investigations, we can observe a new research trend — a shift from a technology-centered to sociology-centered interpretations. It leads to the creation of new perspectives for sociology: now the phenomenon of social bots is not only considered as one of the efficient manipulative technologies but has a wider meaning: new communicative technologies have an informational impact on the social networks space. The objective of this research is to assess the new approaches of the established social bots typologies (based on the fields of their usage, objectives, degree of human behavior imitation), and also consider the ambiguity and controversy of the use of such typologies using the example of botnets operating in the VKontakte social network. A method of botnet identification is based on comprehensive methodology developed by the authors which includes the frequency analysis of published messages, botnet profiling, statistical analysis of content, analysis of botnet structural organization, division of content into semantic units, forming content clusters, content analysis inside the clusters, identification of extremes — maximum number of unique texts published by botnets in a particular cluster for a certain period. The methodology was applied for the botnet space investigation of Russian online social network VKontakte in February and October 2018. The survey has fixed that among 10 of the most active performing botnets, three botnets were identified that demonstrate the ambiguity and controversy of their typologization according to the following criteria: botnet “Defrauded shareholders of LenSpetsStroy” — according to the field of their usage, botnet “Political news in Russian and Ukrainian languages” — according to their objectives, botnet “Ksenia Sobchak” — according to the level of human behavior imitation. The authors identified the prospects for sociological analysis of different types of bots in a situation of growing accessibility and routinization of bot technologies used in social networks. Keywords: social bots, botnets, classification, VKontakte social network

show abstract

“…Fake news is studied both as a result of insufficient training of journalists (Ilchenko, 2018), and as a product for maliciously creating turbulence in society in the context of information wars (Vasilkova & Legostaeva, 2019). There are classifications of fake news on various grounds (Suhodolov & Bychkova, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%