Cooperatives, Economic Democratization and Rural Development 2016
DOI: 10.4337/9781784719388.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital and agricultural cooperatives: experimental evidence from Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diversity of organizational forms exist for this class of economic POs. For example, studies focus on economic functions of producer groups in Poland (Fałkowski, Chlebicka, & Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2017), marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia (Groot Kormelinck, Plaisier, Muradian, & Ruben, 2016), farmer marketing groups in Kenya (Fischer & Qaim, 2012), and producer companies in India and Sri Lanka (Trebbin, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Review On Producer Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diversity of organizational forms exist for this class of economic POs. For example, studies focus on economic functions of producer groups in Poland (Fałkowski, Chlebicka, & Łopaciuk-Gonczaryk, 2017), marketing cooperatives in Ethiopia (Groot Kormelinck, Plaisier, Muradian, & Ruben, 2016), farmer marketing groups in Kenya (Fischer & Qaim, 2012), and producer companies in India and Sri Lanka (Trebbin, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Review On Producer Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has shown that being a member of an agricultural cooperative helps smallholder farmers resolve problems of agriculture‐related production and marketing (Kormelinck et al, 2016; Wanyama et al, 2008; World Bank, 2006), improves their technical efficiency (Abate et al, 2014; Ma et al, 2018) and livelihood (Getnet & Anullo, 2012; Ofori et al, 2019), increases household welfare (Ahmed & Mesfin, 2017; Ma & Abdulai, 2016; Wassie et al, 2019) and strengthens their economic position (Ito et al, 2012). This stabilizes the mood of households and improves their quality of life (Tang, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, health problems are strongly associated with farm income, especially when it is the primary source of income for the household (Logstein, 2016). Being a cooperative member can increase household income and food security (Chagwiza et al, 2016; Ito et al, 2012; Kormelinck et al, 2016; Li et al, 2021; Ma & Abdulai, 2016; Mojo et al, 2017), which not only reduces the income gap, income‐related relative deprivation and psychological stress, but also makes it easier for farmers to obtain resources to meet their livelihood needs, which, in turn, decreases farmers’ stress. Additionally, a higher income enables farmers to access basic health care, contributing to their subjective wellbeing.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of trust may even act as a substitute for formal contracts in contexts where these are not legally enforceable [58]. Inversely, low levels of trust among the participating agents were linked to faltering performances of POs as well as to reduced levels of member commitment and satisfaction with the co-operatives [59,60]. Moreover, the relationships among actors of trust do not exist in a vacuum, but emerge in an already existing social context [61,62].…”
Section: Relational Challenges To Pos Apos and Ibosmentioning
confidence: 99%