2012
DOI: 10.1080/17486831.2012.636257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social capital and its role in poverty reduction: a Canadian-based analysis

Abstract: Social capital is receiving attention from the scholarly community as a potential mechanism for reducing poverty and promoting economic wellbeing. In this study, data are analyzed from Canada's nationally representative General Social Survey in order to estimate the associations between two social capital dimensions; that is, trust and voting behavior, and economic well-being. The results suggest that both generalized and particularized forms of trust as well as voting in national and local elections are posit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the household can enjoy economies of scale in the purchase of goods and services and have a greater incentive to save than a single person, as well as enjoy greater benefits from government social security (Lerman 2002). Evidence in favor of the hypothesis that being single, whether previously married or never married, increases the probability of being poor includes Cotter (2002), D'Ambrosio et al (2011, Lekobane andSeleka (2017), andWeaver (2012). Recent evidence in this same direction is that of Peng et al (2019), who, for the case of Hong Kong, finds that not having a partner (being single, divorced, or separated) significantly increases the probability of being poor.…”
Section: Marital Status Of the Household Headmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, the household can enjoy economies of scale in the purchase of goods and services and have a greater incentive to save than a single person, as well as enjoy greater benefits from government social security (Lerman 2002). Evidence in favor of the hypothesis that being single, whether previously married or never married, increases the probability of being poor includes Cotter (2002), D'Ambrosio et al (2011, Lekobane andSeleka (2017), andWeaver (2012). Recent evidence in this same direction is that of Peng et al (2019), who, for the case of Hong Kong, finds that not having a partner (being single, divorced, or separated) significantly increases the probability of being poor.…”
Section: Marital Status Of the Household Headmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have investigated the determinants of poverty and energy poverty separately. Key factors found to have an impact on poverty include the education status of household members (Chen & Wang, 2015; Peng et al, 2019; Rahman, 2013) and health status (Peng et al, 2019; Weaver, 2012). These two combine to show the strength of the household's human capital.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, households headed by females are consistently found to be more likely to be poor than those headed by males (Grootaert and Braithwaite 1998;Cotter 2002;Devicienti et al 2007). Being single, whether formerly married or have never married, also increases the probability of being poor (Cotter 2002;D'Ambrosio et al 2011;Weaver 2012;Lekobane and Seleka 2017).…”
Section: Demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%