Social capital in buyer-supplier relationships: A review of antecedents, benefits, risks, and boundary conditions

Abstract

The concept of social capital advocates that the goodwill available from relations is a valuable resource that can facilitate collective actions. Although social capital has recently gained momentum in the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR) literature, there is a surprising lack of consensus about its antecedents, benefits, risks, and boundary conditions in such relationships. To address this void, a systematic literature review of seventy articles published in peer-reviewed journals between 2002 and 2018 was undertaken. The review identified and discusses two types of antecedents that can give rise to social capital in BSRs, namely intrafirm-level and relationship-level antecedents (i.e., structural and relational). It reveals that social capital can lead to a variety of benefits, in the form of direct performance improvements (e.g., operational) and relationship benefits (e.g., knowledge sharing), however that these benefits may vary depending on a number of boundary conditions in BSRs (e.g., contract specificity). The review also highlights that although social capital can generate benefits, it can also lead to risks that can undermine the performance and evolution of BSRs (e.g., reduced exploratory learning), suggesting a 'double-edged sword' effect. The paper concludes by summarizing current research gaps and outlining promising directions for future research.

Examining collaborative buyer–supplier relationships and social sustainability in the “new normal” era: the moderating effects of justice and big data analytical intelligence

“…Partners should work hard to create their relationship; the strength of their partnership is based on their previous performance and mutual understanding (Autry & Golicic, 2010 ). Alghababsheh and Gallear ( 2020 ) establish the social capital limit in buyer–supplier relationships. Besides commercial considerations, the social aspect should also be considered in long-term buyer–supplier relationships.…”

Supplier performance in the public healthcare: internal social capital, logistics capabilities and supply chain risk management capabilities as antecedents in a developing economy

“…Improved logistics capabilities have also been linked to effective SCRM capabilities (Gligor and Holcomb, 2014;Wang et al, 2018;Brix-Asala et al, 2021). However, Alghababsheh and Gallear (2020) We adopted a positivist epistemological position following a deductive cross-sectional approach to test for pre-specified research hypotheses. We studied health facilities from eastern Uganda, with 122 valid responses from 52 public healthcare facilities.…”

Social Capital in the Family Business Literature: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda

“…In a review article, Zheng (2010) found that structural and relational SC seem to reinforce each other in a feedback loop and concluded that there is no clear boundary between relational and cognitive SC, which are likely to be highly intercorrelated. In a recent review, Alghababsheh and Gallear (2020) stated that there seems to be a consensus that structural SC facilitates the development of relational and cognitive SC and that cognitive SC fosters relational SC. While the relationships among the SC dimensions are not clarified in the management literature, they are even less explored in the context of FBs.…”