2008
DOI: 10.3860/psr.v53i0.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Capital in the Philippines: Results from a National Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Philippines social science literature has rarely been examined using the conceptual framework of bonding, bridging and linking social capital (Abad, 2005). Nevertheless, recent studies based on national survey research have provided some valuable insights into the state of social capital in the archipelago (Abad, 2005; Porio and See, 2017). Both studies found that rich bonding capital among family and friends is pervasive in Philippines society but most Filipinos lack bridging and linking capital.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Philippines social science literature has rarely been examined using the conceptual framework of bonding, bridging and linking social capital (Abad, 2005). Nevertheless, recent studies based on national survey research have provided some valuable insights into the state of social capital in the archipelago (Abad, 2005; Porio and See, 2017). Both studies found that rich bonding capital among family and friends is pervasive in Philippines society but most Filipinos lack bridging and linking capital.…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thick trust is defined by Putnam as ‘trust embedded in personal relations that are strong, frequent, and embedded in wider networks’ (Putnam, 2000: 136). In contrast ‘thin trust’ or generalised trust is a person's estimation of the general moral standards of the surrounding society, and in Filipino society, there is a scarcity of social cohesion and a lack of thin trust (Abad, 2005; Rothstein and Uslaner, 2005); however, thick trust in the Philippines is extremely strong, so much so that when members of one's family makes a request of them, it is almost impossible to refuse. That said, such forms of allegiance can also lead to negative forms of social capital such as the ‘in‐group’ acceptance of corruption and nepotism or criminal behaviour (Lin, 2001).…”
Section: Social Capital Trust and Norms In The Philippines Disaster mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As highlighted earlier, three types of social capital are identified as crucial for vulnerable communities: bonding, bridging and linking. In the Philippines, recent studies based on national survey research have provided some valuable insights into the state of social capital in the archipelago (Abad, 2005; Porio, 2017). Both studies found that rich bonding capital among family and friends is pervasive in Filipino society, but most Filipinos lack bridging and linking capital, as well as lack associational ties.…”
Section: Social Capital Trust and Norms In The Philippines Disaster mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Filipinos have difficulty viewing the common good as the social welfare of the larger community, such as the nation, region, or the "insignificant other" or group that is not personally related to them as members of the family, relatives, and friends. A sociological study of Abad (2008) on social capital in the Philippines showed that Filipinos have difficulty understanding the social world beyond their family, relatives, and friends. This narrow understanding of community prevents Filipinos from being involved in something that promotes the greater good of the state and the society at large.…”
Section: Social and Structural Sins And The Common Good: Illustratingmentioning
confidence: 99%