Social class, control, and action: Socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action

Abstract

Addressing social issues such as climate change requires significant support and engagement of citizens with diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. The present research examines whether individuals who vary in their socioeconomic status significantly differ in their psychological antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. Study 1, using U.S. nationally representative data, showed that personal beliefs about climate change predicted support for pro-environmental policies more strongly among individuals with a higher, relative to lower, SES background. Studies 2 and 3, by employing correlational and experimental approaches respectively, found that general sense of control over life outcomes underlies the extent to which support for pro-environmental action is contingent on personal beliefs about climate change. Study 4 identified perceived social norms about pro-environmental actions as an alternative predictor of support for pro-environmental action among people from lower SES background. Taken together, the present research shows that individuals with distinct socioeconomic backgrounds differ in their key psychological levers of pro-environmental action. To grasp how to solve urgent social issues such as climate change requires greater understanding of the psychology of citizens with diverse backgrounds. 1.1. Psychological antecedents of support for pro-environmental action A large volume of research has generated theoretical frameworks and empirical findings to better understand the psychology of pro-environmental action (

Youth-led climate strikes: fresh opportunities and enduring challenges for youth research - commentary to Bowman

“…While there was no data on race from the protests in Europe (Wahlström et al 2019), the report identified a higher number of female protesters than male and some indication that they were from middle class or well-educated backgrounds with 73% with a parent with at least one university degree (Wahlström et al 2019). This pattern confirms earlier studies of young people interested in environmental issues, which report similar high female and middleclass representation (Chawla 2007;Kraus et al 2012;Eom et al 2018). For example, a survey of members of Generation Zero, a youth-led environmental activist group in New Zealand, found a largely homogenous membership made up of middle-class, European-origin young people with Green Party political affiliations (Dodson & Papoutsaki 2017).…”

Developing a Scalable Dynamic Norm Menu-Based Intervention to Reduce Meat Consumption

“…Second, the influence of social norms has been shown to be stronger for those low in socioeconomic status, and weaker or ineffective for those in high socioeconomic status, in changing both sustainable behavior [29] and consumer behavior [30]. One reason why is because people who are higher in socio-economic status perceive their actions as reflecting their autonomous choices [31] and prefer to make self-determined choices that do not appear to conform to others [32].…”

Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans

“…In the absence of such information, people may rely on stereotypes to infer ingroup norms (29,30). For instance, in part due to greater resource constraints, Americans of lower socioeconomic status are more sensitive to the opinions of others, relative to individuals of higher socioeconomic status, and show stronger effects of perceived norms on their environmental behavior (31). Additional research suggests perceived norms may influence whether members of minority groups engage in conversation about environmental issues.…”