2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social cognition and self-reported ASD traits in young adults who have reported psychotic experiences: A population-based, longitudinal study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMET has 36 items, which assess mentalising, whereby participants are shown the eye region of the face and asked, untimed, to pick one of four options, which best describe the mental state. Items can be further grouped by positive, neutral, or negative valence [ 66 , 67 ]. The test includes a balanced combination of male and female images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMET has 36 items, which assess mentalising, whereby participants are shown the eye region of the face and asked, untimed, to pick one of four options, which best describe the mental state. Items can be further grouped by positive, neutral, or negative valence [ 66 , 67 ]. The test includes a balanced combination of male and female images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task [RMET; (39)] is a 36-item assessment where black and white photographs of eye regions are presented, and participants are requested to infer mental states from four choices provided. The RMET can also provide individual scores for Positive, Negative, and Neutral valence (56)(57)(58)(59). Examples of Positive valence include Friendly (Q20); Negative valence: Hostile (Q26); Neutral valence: pensive (Q24).…”
Section: The Reading the Mind In The Eyes Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item is scored 1 if the answer is correct and 0 if the answer is incorrect, with a range of 0–36 on the measure. In addition to having good test–retest reliability, it is not confounded by gender when assessed on large-scale groups, and it can be further stratified by positive, negative, or neutral stimuli valence, with 18-item repeatable short forms also available [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Pragmatically, the RMET may be particularly useful as a multimodal measure of mentalising among neurodegenerative populations, as it can be responded to verbally or by pointing and contains a glossary of terms should an individual be unfamiliar with a word.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%