2023
DOI: 10.1002/pchj.662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social compensation of performance drops in dyadic exercises—Two experiments testing the role of relationship quality

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze whether the social compensation of performance drops in a team setting depends on the relationship quality. Two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1: In a team‐building condition, the relationship quality between subject and confederate was manipulated. The performance situation consisted of an isometric strength task. A joint team result had to be achieved in a second run, whereby the subject received manipulated feedback on the confederate's performance, hence sug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MacAlpine and Stone (2017) insinuate that poor teamwork can result in a drop in performance of many students and reduced effectiveness, as students may focus on individual tasks rather than sharing ideas and exchanging content learned in MML settings. According to Boss, Pels and Kleinert (2023), shared responsibility on difficult concepts would also lack due to failure to exchange ideas. Collective student vision is not possible due to them being in silos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacAlpine and Stone (2017) insinuate that poor teamwork can result in a drop in performance of many students and reduced effectiveness, as students may focus on individual tasks rather than sharing ideas and exchanging content learned in MML settings. According to Boss, Pels and Kleinert (2023), shared responsibility on difficult concepts would also lack due to failure to exchange ideas. Collective student vision is not possible due to them being in silos.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%