2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0020936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social connections and suicidal thoughts and behavior.

Abstract: Disrupted social connectedness is associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors among individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs). The current study sought to further characterize this relationship by examining several indices of social connectedness-1) living alone, 2) perceived social support, 3) interpersonal conflict, 4) belongingness. Participants (n = 814) were recruited from four residential substance-use treatment programs and completed self-report measures of social connectedness as well as whet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
77
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
13
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agents of poisoning showed a similar trend in all age categories with a maximum consumption of household agents followed by drugs for DSH (Tables 1 and 3 Four main factors were interpersonal conflict, stress, dissatisfaction, and others. Interpersonal conflict was the chief reason and this is consistent with the literature that interpersonal conflict is among the top-stated reasons for suicide attempts, especially among young people [15][16][17]. The conflicts included fights and arguments with family members, friends, and even colleagues.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Agents of poisoning showed a similar trend in all age categories with a maximum consumption of household agents followed by drugs for DSH (Tables 1 and 3 Four main factors were interpersonal conflict, stress, dissatisfaction, and others. Interpersonal conflict was the chief reason and this is consistent with the literature that interpersonal conflict is among the top-stated reasons for suicide attempts, especially among young people [15][16][17]. The conflicts included fights and arguments with family members, friends, and even colleagues.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Restrictive engulfment involves such acts as attempting to keep one from seeing friends or family, complaining about them socializing, or asking friends/family members about their whereabouts. This implies that the victim has a social network—albeit one that the perpetrator is attempting to isolate them from—that buffers effects such control may have on suicidal ideation (You et al, 2011). Alternatively, individuals victimized by restrictive engulfment may employ coping strategies other than suicidal ideation such as placating perpetrator worries underlying restrictive engulfment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stable and healthy relationships, such as romantic relationships, are strong, targetable protective factors for suicidal ideation (Gunnell, Harbord, Singleton, Jenkins, & Lewis, 2004; Kleiman, Riskind, & Schaefer, 2014; Mazza & Reynolds, 1998; You, Van Orden, & Conner, 2011). Studies examining relationship factors associated with suicide risk have highlighted victimization by intimate partner violence (IPV), defined as physical, sexual, and/or emotional abuse within couples, as a correlate of suicidal ideation (see Golding, 1999 for a meta-analysis; Saltzman et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that abstinence social support may not be enough to counter other social influences related to substance use such as perceptions of 12-step group cohesion and 12-step peers (Noordsy et al, 1996; Rice & Tonigan, 2012), some of whom may not extend a sense of belongingness necessary to counter pathological behavior (You, Van Orden, & Conner, 2011), especially among 12-step peers who view psychiatric medication use as drug-use behavior among persons with psychiatric comorbid substance use disorders (Laudet, 2000). However, these findings may be limited to clients receiving a total abstinence approach to recovery and they may not necessarily generalize among clients receiving drug replacement therapies who attend alternative 12-step groups for those on medications (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%