2018
DOI: 10.3390/su10041254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Considerations of Large River Sanctuaries: A Case Study from the Hilsa Shad Fishery in Bangladesh

Abstract: The establishment of a sanctuary is often suggested as an effective strategy for ecological restoration, though social aspects of such attempts are often overlooked. This study analyzed the socioeconomic status of 248 fishing households who are dependent on hilsa shad (Tenualosa ilisha) sanctuaries in southern Bangladesh. Also, the fishers' perceptions were investigated to assess the status of ecological restoration, level of participation in the hilsa sanctuary management, their livelihoods constraints, and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SLAs are a way of understanding the needs of the poor and identifying the significant constraints and positive strength for their resilience. Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, a fishery-based livelihood embraces several components: (a) livelihood assets (owned or accessed by people, i.e., human, financial, physical, natural, and social capital), (b) vulnerability context (risk factors surrounding livelihoods); (c) transforming structures and processes (the structures associated with a formal organization, e.g., government, NGOs, laws and rights, social relations and participation) (d) livelihood strategies (the range and combination of activities people undertake or do to achieve livelihood goals such as productive activities, investment strategies); and (e) livelihood outcomes (achievement or output of the people’s livelihood strategies) [ 22 ]. Through open-ended interviews and FGD, much information was gathered about access to different types of capital, livelihood strategies and decision-making processes, local institutions, and their ability and willingness to respond to changing vulnerability contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SLAs are a way of understanding the needs of the poor and identifying the significant constraints and positive strength for their resilience. Based on the sustainable livelihood framework, a fishery-based livelihood embraces several components: (a) livelihood assets (owned or accessed by people, i.e., human, financial, physical, natural, and social capital), (b) vulnerability context (risk factors surrounding livelihoods); (c) transforming structures and processes (the structures associated with a formal organization, e.g., government, NGOs, laws and rights, social relations and participation) (d) livelihood strategies (the range and combination of activities people undertake or do to achieve livelihood goals such as productive activities, investment strategies); and (e) livelihood outcomes (achievement or output of the people’s livelihood strategies) [ 22 ]. Through open-ended interviews and FGD, much information was gathered about access to different types of capital, livelihood strategies and decision-making processes, local institutions, and their ability and willingness to respond to changing vulnerability contexts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though in recent times research regarding socio-ecological resilience has grown progressively, the link between ecological and social resilience is not entirely clear [5]. However, it could be expected that a resilient ecosystem has the potential to support resilient communities and vice versa [51] but the interaction is not straightforward. For instance, social outcomes of resilient ecosystems are often mediated by several factors such as communities' resources, rights and access to the environment [7].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective community surveillance including representatives from all stakeholders would be instrumental to ensure compliance with conservation rules and regulations. An effective, sanctuary-based, comanagement body should be introduced in all the sanctuaries to conserve resources in a sustainable manner (Islam et al 2018;van Brakel et al 2018). However, because Hilsa is a shared species in the Bay of Bengal region, especially in Bangladesh, India, and Myanmar, a regional management initiative, in addition to the national efforts, could be initiated to further improve the management of the species.…”
Section: Management Issues and Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%