2013
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.566897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Desirability, Environmental Attitudes, and General Ecological Behaviour in Children

Abstract: Socially desirable responses have been widely discussed as potentially biasing self-reported measures of environmental attitude and behaviour assessment. The direct and moderating effect of social desirability on children has not been analysed before. By applying a Lie scale together with a two-factor environmental attitude set measure and a scale of self-reported General Ecological Behaviour (GEB) to 198 pupils, we found a moderate impact of Lie scores on only one of both attitude measures and a small impact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
48
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This hypothesis received no support from Experiments 2 and 3. Taken together, it is unlikely that the eco-label effect is simply due to reporting preference for eco-labeled products because it is regarded as socially desirable to do so (Félonneau & Becker, 2008;Oerke & Bogner, 2013). The lack of support for a social desirability account of the eco-label effect is consistent with other evidence reported previously wherein the social desirability account was addressed by experimental manipulations (Sörqvist et al, 2013) as opposed to the correlational means used here.…”
Section: Implications For the Social Desirability Account Of The Eco-supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This hypothesis received no support from Experiments 2 and 3. Taken together, it is unlikely that the eco-label effect is simply due to reporting preference for eco-labeled products because it is regarded as socially desirable to do so (Félonneau & Becker, 2008;Oerke & Bogner, 2013). The lack of support for a social desirability account of the eco-label effect is consistent with other evidence reported previously wherein the social desirability account was addressed by experimental manipulations (Sörqvist et al, 2013) as opposed to the correlational means used here.…”
Section: Implications For the Social Desirability Account Of The Eco-supporting
confidence: 89%
“…One factor that may question the validity of the eco-label effect as reflecting real differences in sensory perception and/or the participants' ''true views'' is social desirability (i.e., people's tendency to behave in ways that are approved by others). Indeed, to prefer eco-labeled products is regarded as socially desirable by society (Félonneau & Becker, 2008;Oerke & Bogner, 2013) and therefore it is reasonable to suspect that the eco-label effect is, at least in part, a consequence of social desirability (more specifically a consequence of impression management, a deceptive attempt to appear as if one holds attitudes and behaviors that are approved by others, upon making the product estimates). One way to test this hypothesis is to request participants to fill in a social desirability scale (Rudmin, 1999) that is designed to identify participants who respond in a socially desirable, but untruthful, way.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hartig et al (2001) found that, for adults, social desirability predicted reported ecological behavior, but the predictive power of restoration was not reduced when social desirability was included in the analysis. Similarly, Oerke and Bogner (2013) found, in a group of adolescents, that social desirability did not moderate the relation between environmental attitudes and self-reported behavior. Nevertheless, the potential risk of social desirability should be considered in future studies, and a social desirability measure, such as the Children's Social Desirability questionnaire (Crandall, Crandall, & Katkovsky, 1965), could be included when designing studies on children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have already mentioned social desirability bias, where children may not accurately respond regarding socially desirable characteristics in order to appear more appealing to researchers [23]. Specifically for evaluation, this translates to children not wanting to tell an adult that the system they have built is not great.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%