Social Disadvantage, Tenure and Location: An Analysis of Sydney and Melbourne

Randolph, Bill; Holloway, Darren

doi:10.1080/08111470500135136

Cited by 81 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Latterly, however, Australia's major cities have witnessed an ongoing dynamic of suburbanizing disadvantage partly linked with inner urban area gentrification (Badcock, 1994;Baum & Gleeson, 2010;Maher, 1992;Randolph & Holloway, 2005bYates & Vipond, 1990). While similar urban processes have been widely seen across the developed world (Atkinson, 2004;Davidson, 2008;Lees, 2008) these have been especially vigorous in Australia.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Dissecting and tracking socio-spatial disadvantage in urban Australia

Pawson

Herath

2015

Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Dissecting and tracking socio-spatial disadvantage in urban Australia

Pawson

Herath

2015

Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The suburbanization of poverty (Cooke & Denton, 2015;Hulchanski, 2010;Randolph & Holloway, 2005;Randolph & Tice, 2014) represents a significant break from previous periods, where poverty was first and foremost an inner city feature and reflects the growing cleavage between a gentrifying urban core and a disadvantaged "filtering" periphery (Hedin et al, 2012;Skaburskis & Nelson, 2014). These shifts are generally gradual and take place over a longer period of time, as many areas are also marked by high levels of stability (Zwiers, Kleinhans, & Van Ham, 2016b) due to nonmoving residents and selective mobility patterns that tend to reproduce neighborhood status (Hedman, Van Ham, & Manley, 2011;Musterd, Van Gent, Das, & Latten, 2016).…”

Section: Gentrification Displacement and The Suburbanization Of Povmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods Hochstenbach, C.; Musterd, S. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: http://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. Many postindustrial cities across Europe and other contexts are marked by growing social-spatial inequalities, housing liberalization, and gentrification, which limit the housing options of lowincome households. We investigated changes in the residential moves of different low-income households (working poor, lowto-middle income, and unemployed) in the Amsterdam and Rotterdam urban regions for the time period 2004-2013. We found an overarching trend for the suburbanization of poverty toward the urban peripheries and surrounding regions. While this trend appears to be relatively crisis resistant in the tight Amsterdam housing context, it is more cyclical in Rotterdam and has slowed following the global financial crisis. Low-to-middle income and unemployed households are increasingly moving to the urban regions surrounding cities, particularly to higher density satellite towns. Nevertheless, a growing number of working poor households remain highly urbanized, employing various coping strategies to acquire housing. This paper reveals how the suburbanization of poverty is both a direct process of poor households moving from city to suburb, and a broader indirect process caused by exclusionary mechanisms such as the decreasing accessibility and affordability of inner-urban neighborhoods, which reflect broader changes in the geography and socioeconomic patterning of urban regions. ARTICLE HISTORY

show abstract

“…Si bien en los primeros estadios de los procesos de suburbanización tuvieron (y aún mantienen) gran importancia relativa las clases medias, y medias-altas (Susino, 2003;Susino y Duque, 2013), lo cierto es que en los últimos años se está agudizando la tendencia de la suburbanización de la pobreza (Randolph y Holloway, 2005;Cooke, 2010;Cooke y Denton, 2015;Covington, 2015), es decir, la movilidad residencial de las clases populares hacia las periferias suburbanas. Entre las causas de este proceso podríamos destacar el incremento de los costes económicos, pero especialmente temporales, que implican los desplazamientos por trabajo y ocio de los grupos más pudientes suburbanitas, que les lleva a retornar a la ciudad.…”

Section: ¿Quién Entra Y Quién Sale De Las Ciudades? El Estado De La Cunclassified

¿Seleccionan las ciudades a su población? Tendencias de selectividad residencial en las cabeceras metropolitanas andaluzas

Torrado¹

2018

Cuadernos Geográficos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenTras la generalización de los procesos metropolitanos y la reciente especialización en la nueva economía de los servicios, las cabeceras metropolitanas están sufriendo un proceso de reconfiguración socio-demográfica, según el cual determinados grupos son atraídos hacia ellas, mientras otros, son progresivamente desplazados a las periferias suburbanas, extrapolándose la división social del espacio a escala metropolitana. El objetivo del presente trabajo consiste en ahondar en el papel que juegan las dinámicas de movilidad residencial en dicho proceso, para conocer si las cabeceras seleccionan de algún modo a sus habitantes. Para ello utilizaremos el Censo 2011 para Andalucía, del cual disponemos de una explotación propia que cuenta con una delimitación de las áreas metropolitanas la cual permite definir diferentes flujos de movilidad residencial según origen y destino. Nuestro objetivo es analizar, a través de modelos de regresión logística multinomial, la propensión que tienen los individuos, en función de sus características, de realizar cada uno de los movimientos contemplados, para acercarnos así a los factores de atracción y repulsión de las cabeceras metropolitanas. Entre los principales hallazgos del trabajo se encuentra el demostrar que, aunque incipientes, ya operan tendencias que nos permiten hablar de cierta selectividad residencial.Palabras clave: Movilidad residencial; áreas metropolitanas; cabeceras metropolitanas; selectividad migratoria; reconfiguración social Abstract Do the cities select their population? Residential selectivity trends in Andalusian inner-citiesAfter the generalization of metropolitan processes and the recent specialization in the new services economy, inner-cities are undergoing a process of socio-demographic reconfiguration, according to which certain groups are attracted to them, while others are progressively displaced to the Metropolitan peripheries, extrapolating the spatial social division on a metropolitan scale. The objective of the present work is to delve into the role played by the dynamics of residential mobility in this process, in order to know if inner-cities select in some way the inhabitants. To do this we will use the data from the 2011 Census for Andalusia, of which we own a particular 1. Este trabajo es fruto del sub-proyecto «Procesos de reconfiguración social metropolitana» (CSO2014-55780-C3-3-P) , dentro del proyecto coordinado de investigación «Movilidad y ciudad real: dinámicas y cambios territoriales y sociales en España» (CSO2014-55780-C3), financiado por el Torrado, J. M. (2018). ¿Seleccionan las ciudades a su población?Cuadernos Geográficos 57(2), 211-236 explotation wich include a delimitation of the metropolitan areas that allows defining different residential mobility flows with origin and destination in the cities. Our objective is to analyze, through two multinomial logistic regression models, the propensity of individuals, according to their characteristics, to perform each of the movements contemplated, in order to approach the factors...

show abstract

Social Disadvantage, Tenure and Location: An Analysis of Sydney and Melbourne

Cited by 81 publications

References 25 publications

Dissecting and tracking socio-spatial disadvantage in urban Australia

Dissecting and tracking socio-spatial disadvantage in urban Australia

Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods

¿Seleccionan las ciudades a su población? Tendencias de selectividad residencial en las cabeceras metropolitanas andaluzas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About