A. PROOFS FOR SECTION 3 WE FIRST RECALL SOME RESULTS about semimartingale topology originally introduced by Émery (1979) (see Czichowsky and Schweizer (2006), Kardaras (2013), andCuchiero andTeichmann (2015) for recent applications in mathematical finance). The semimartingale topology is stronger than the topology of uniform convergence in probability on compacts (ucp). In the latter case, the supremum in Eq. (2.1) is only taken over integrands in the form η t = 1 [0 s] (t) for every s > 0:The following inequality due to Burkholder is useful for proving convergence in the semimartingale topology in Theorem 3.1 (see Meyer (1972, Theorem 47, p. 50) for discrete martingales and Cuchiero and Teichmann (2015) for continuous martingales, where a proof is provided inside the proof of their Lemma 4.7).LEMMA A.1: For every martingale X and every predictable process η bounded by 1, |η t | ≤ 1, it holds that aP supfor all a ≥ 0 and t > 0.We will also use the following result (see Kardaras (2013, Proposition 2.10)).We will also make use of the following lemma.LEMMA A.3: Let (X n t ) t≥0 be a sequence of martingales such that X n t