2021
DOI: 10.1002/casp.2574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social disparities in health behaviours: The role of class‐related behavioural norms and social class identification

Abstract: Inequalities in health behaviours (i.e., the tendency of socially disadvantaged people, compared to more advantaged people, to engage in fewer healthy behaviours) have been mostly accounted for by individual and environmental factors. The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…People are more likely to be guided by what is perceived to be common and desirable in their group, if they think, feel and behave like typical group members, and this partly depends on the degree to which they identify with their ingroup. Research has supported this notion by showing that the impact of social group norms is stronger for higher compared to lower identifiers (e.g., Blondé et al, 2022;Masson & Fritsche, 2014). However, because high identifiers perceive a relatively strong overlap between themselves and their ingroup, the reverse process of self-anchoring (or social projection), is more likely for them as well (Thijs & Verkuyten, 2016).…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People are more likely to be guided by what is perceived to be common and desirable in their group, if they think, feel and behave like typical group members, and this partly depends on the degree to which they identify with their ingroup. Research has supported this notion by showing that the impact of social group norms is stronger for higher compared to lower identifiers (e.g., Blondé et al, 2022;Masson & Fritsche, 2014). However, because high identifiers perceive a relatively strong overlap between themselves and their ingroup, the reverse process of self-anchoring (or social projection), is more likely for them as well (Thijs & Verkuyten, 2016).…”
Section: Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%