2022
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social effects of rabies infection in male vampire bats ( Desmodus rotundus )

Abstract: Rabies virus (RABV) transmitted by the common vampire bat ( Desmodus rotundus ) poses a threat to agricultural development and public health throughout the Neotropics. The ecology and evolution of rabies host–pathogen dynamics are influenced by two infection-induced behavioural changes. RABV-infected hosts often exhibit increased aggression which facilitates transmission, and rabies also leads to reduced activity and paralysis prior to death. Although several studies document rabies-ind… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, examples of parasite manipulation to increase host sociality are rare, with observed behavioral changes more often manifesting as host-mediated declines in sociality (Cárdenas-Canales et al, 2022;Hawley et al, 2021). Our results represent a case of a directly transmitted pathogen causing augmented rather than reduced host sociality, potentially due to host-mediated behavioral changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, examples of parasite manipulation to increase host sociality are rare, with observed behavioral changes more often manifesting as host-mediated declines in sociality (Cárdenas-Canales et al, 2022;Hawley et al, 2021). Our results represent a case of a directly transmitted pathogen causing augmented rather than reduced host sociality, potentially due to host-mediated behavioral changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Acute infections can alter host social preferences via diverse mechanisms, mediated by the pathogen or host. While some pathogens appear to manipulate infected hosts to increase sociality in ways that benefit pathogen transmission (Klein, 2003 ; Rode et al., 2013 ), the most common host‐mediated behavioral changes during infection are sickness behaviors (e.g., lethargy and anorexia (Hart, 1988 )), which generally reduce social interactions and pathogen transmission potential (Cárdenas‐Canales et al., 2022 ; Hamilton et al., 2020 ; Lopes et al., 2016 ; Ripperger et al., 2020 ). However, social interactions may also be decreased when uninfected individuals actively avoid their infected conspecifics (Zylberberg et al., 2013 ), obscuring the true social preferences of infected hosts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sickness behavior we observed was similar to the responses of vampire bats to simulated infections with injections of lipopolysaccharide, LPS (12,20). We quantified sickness behaviors in response to a naturally-infecting pathogen, which is less often done for vertebrates (but see 33,35,39,40) compared to studies on sickness behavior using an immune challenge (e.g., (8,(10)(11)(12)15,20,24,31,(41)(42)(43). The use of immune challenges, like LPS, allows for controlled experiments on the connection between the inflammatory and the behavioral response to infection, but naturally infecting pathogens can have different, pathogen-specific effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Our results should be treated with caution due to the impossibility of estimating effect sizes precisely with small sample sizes (9 infected bats with varying levels of infection severity). However, while several studies have quantified social interactions when animals are infected with, or exposed to pathogens (14,(16)(17)(18)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38), to our knowledge, no studies have focused on the impact of infections on social bond formation. Our findings and effect size estimates could therefore be valuable for informing future studies that test this hypothesis in more detail.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation