Social entrepreneurship and well-being: The configurational impact of institutions and social capital

Deng, Wei; Liang, Qiaozhuan; Fan, Pengfei; Cui, Lin

doi:10.1007/s10490-019-09660-6

Cited by 31 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 81 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Social policymakers meanwhile, must be cogniscant of the impact that the over or underprovision of public funding may have upon private sources of income. These may be sources of investment that are sometimes socially constructed, politically motivated, and nationally or regionally differentiated, and therefore highly susceptible to change (Hervieux and Voltan, 2018;Jarrodi, Byrne, and Bureau, 2019;Deng, Liang, Fan, and Cui, 2020).…”

Section: Tension 5: Sources Of Income and Investmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciling social enterprise: beyond the paradox perspective

White

Samuel

Peattie

et al. 2022

IJEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe paper aims to critically review the increasingly taken-for-granted view of social enterprise (SE) as inherently paradoxical and tackles the research question as follows: are the tensions experienced by SE and social entrepreneurs (SEnt) actually paradoxical and if not, what are the implications for theory and practice?Design/methodology/approachA paradox theory (PT) approach has been utilized to explore the implications, validity and helpfulness of the paradox perspective in understanding and managing the tensions that are inherent in SE.FindingsConceptualizing the primary tension of doing social good through commercial activity as a paradox is argued to be a limiting misnomer that conspires to reify and perpetuate the tensions that SE and SEnt have to manage. Drawing upon PT, the findings of the paper reconceptualize these tensions as myths, dilemmas and dialectics, which are subsequently used to develop a more complete ontological framework of the challenges that arise in SE and for SEnt.Practical implicationsReconceptualizing the “inherent paradoxes” of SE as either dilemmas or dialectics affords a means of pursuing their successful resolution. Consequently, this view alleviates much of the pressure that SE managers and SEnt may feel in needing to pursue commercial goals alongside social goals.Originality/valueThe work presents new theoretical insights to challenge the dominant view of SE as inherently paradoxical.

show abstract

Section: Tension 5: Sources Of Income and Investmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reconciling social enterprise: beyond the paradox perspective

White

Samuel

Peattie

et al. 2022

IJEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The other variables (gender, entrepreneurship course, entrepreneurship faculty, entrepreneurship competition, entrepreneurship practice, entrepreneurship policy, and entrepreneurship education performance of medical students) are all taken from the questionnaire. Datas were nested analyzed with the approach of mixed embeddedness (Deng et al, 2020;Brieger and Gielnik, 2021).…”

Section: Research Variables System Construction and Data Sourcesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Drivers of Entrepreneurship Education Performance of Medical Students in the Digital Age

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

COVID-19 has made the entire society pay more attention to medical students training. Medicine development is inseparable from the spirit of innovation, focusing on cultivating medical students' innovative awareness and improving entrepreneurship education performance, which has an irreplaceable effect on both the students themselves and the society. This study is based on the ridge regression model to study the driving factors of the entrepreneurship education performance of medical students. Compared with traditional multiple regression, it can improve the consistency of parameter estimation and obtain more realistic results. Based on a large sample of empirical survey data of 24,677 medical students in China, this study analyzed the driving factors of the entrepreneurship education performance of medical students and found that medical students of different genders have differences in entrepreneurship education performance; the digital economy impacts entrepreneurship education performance of medical students; entrepreneurship course, entrepreneurship faculty, entrepreneurship competition, entrepreneurship practice, and entrepreneurship policy have a driving effect on the entrepreneurship education performance of medical students. Meanwhile, the impact of entrepreneurship policy is the most obvious, followed by entrepreneurship practice and entrepreneurship competition, followed by entrepreneurship course and entrepreneurship faculty.

show abstract

“…Social entrepreneurship is important because it can help increase growth, achieve a stable, fair, and prosperous economy, and become an innovative market in various countries (Acs et al, 2018;Aparicio, Urbano, & Gomez, 2018;Popov, Veretennikora, & Kozinskaya, 2018;Sohel, 2018, Ogbo et al, 2019Deng et al, 2020). Apart from creating high expectations, it is considered a new approach to tackling poverty and social exclusion in developing countries (Seelos & Mair, 2009).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This means that the economic institution's contribution to development has far exceeded the availability of natural resources, the supply of other production factors, and technological advances (Acemoglu & Robinson, 2008;Prasetyo & Dzaki, 2020;Prasetyo, Setyadharma, & Kistanti, 2019). A recent literature study showed that the configuration of institutional conditions and social capital has led to a high prevalence rate of various social entrepreneurship activities in a country (Deng et al, 2020). Furthermore, institutional theory related to social entrepreneurship positively contributes to the development of socially-oriented activities and new institutional theories (Popov, Veretennikora, & Kozinskaya, 2018).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Collaboration of Social Entrepreneurship and Institution for Sustainable Regional Development Security

Prasetyo¹,

Setyadharma²,

Kistanti³

2021

OJBM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global prevention efforts, including mitigating the Covid-19 impact, require a more serious mechanism, such as maintaining sustainable regional development security. This research examines the role of social entrepreneurship collaboration with institutions in maintaining sustainable regional development security using empirical data and path analysis. To measure sustainability, sustainable entrepreneurship business opportunities are used as an aspect of sustainable regional development. The results show that the new model innovation of social entrepreneurship collaboration and institutional quality is an important mechanism capable of optimizing resource use, overcoming socio-economic problems and poverty, and increasing productivity. Furthermore, it is a value chain in promoting public policy implementation and mitigating sustainable regional development security. Since the new model innovation creates better social and economic justice values, it is the most important innovation element in the basic framework of social innovation sustainability theory.

show abstract

Social entrepreneurship and well-being: The configurational impact of institutions and social capital

Cited by 31 publications

References 81 publications

Reconciling social enterprise: beyond the paradox perspective

Reconciling social enterprise: beyond the paradox perspective

Research on the Drivers of Entrepreneurship Education Performance of Medical Students in the Digital Age

The Collaboration of Social Entrepreneurship and Institution for Sustainable Regional Development Security

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About