2005
DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2005.12001398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Equity Is a Pillar of Public Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following is an illustration of the existing condition of BUMDes management. and other parties (Frederickson, 2018;Glaser, 2012;Svara & Brunet, 2018). Therefore, one of the biggest challenges of democracy today is how to guarantee respect for the rights of citizens and accommodate the diversity that exists in society, including in carrying out social business activities that are not only financial profit oriented, but also social profit (Baber, Bartlett, Baber, & Bartlett, 2015;Stansbury & Irvin, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is an illustration of the existing condition of BUMDes management. and other parties (Frederickson, 2018;Glaser, 2012;Svara & Brunet, 2018). Therefore, one of the biggest challenges of democracy today is how to guarantee respect for the rights of citizens and accommodate the diversity that exists in society, including in carrying out social business activities that are not only financial profit oriented, but also social profit (Baber, Bartlett, Baber, & Bartlett, 2015;Stansbury & Irvin, 2004).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kabanoff [32] links the different aspects of equity and equality with conflict in two basic pressures: (a) one stems from equity violations and results in overt conflict involving attempts to restore equity and (b) the other stems from equality violations and results in non-directed conflict that is symptomatic of decreased social cohesiveness. According to Frederickson [33], social equity in public administration is dealing with fairness of organization, management and delivery of public services and in the United States system is considered a third pillar after efficiency and economy [34]. The concept of equity in the socio-spatial studies has had various handlings from the different disciplinary approaches, with some problematizing the complex situation faced by equity that leads to other discussions of variables or indicators, such as: distribution, availability, access, quality of spaces and particularly power, Governance, and decision-making [15,26,35].…”
Section: Research Question and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Svara and Brunet (2005) promote the use of John Rawls' second principle of justice as fairness, sometimes referred to as the difference principle or maximin criterion, 13 as a guide for public administrators seeking to reduce inequality. 14 They do not explain, however, what might give Rawlsian theory this preeminent standing.…”
Section: Speaking Truth To Power As the Normative Standard: The Case mentioning
confidence: 99%